DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
ERS
Docket No: 12093-10
24 February 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 24 February 2011. After careful consideration of
your application, the Board concluded that your application was
not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of
justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a
timely manner. The Board concluded that you were aware o£ the
alleged error or injustice in your record in 1992, when you were
released from active duty under honorable conditions, rather
than in 2010 as you stated in your application.
You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request
must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not
reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
The evidence may pertain to the timeliness of your application
or to its merits. Absent such additional evidence, further
review of your application is not possible. The names and votes
of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEI
5 Executive Direc
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11982-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2011. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07612-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 May 2011. Documentary Material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. At that time you were not recommended for retention or reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09213-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the’ existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09614-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You requested an under conditions other than honorable (OTH) discharge for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial for two periods of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05754-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 February 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04417-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 12 February 1971, your case was heard by an ADB, which voted unanimously in favor of a UD due to misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10751-10
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05168-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your narrative reason for separation, or reentry code due to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04830-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05693-10
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...