Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10328-09
Original file (10328-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100

' JSR
Docket No. 10328-09
‘5 November 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

       

To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: ssScq— Arges
REVIEW OF NAVAL. RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: _ (1) DD Form 149 dtd 28 Sep 09 w/attachments

(2) ‘HOMC MIO:-memo dtd'26 Oct 09
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the service record page lla
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 10 May 2004, a
copy of which is at Tab A.

2. The: Board, consisting of Ms. Mann and Messrs. Bowen and
McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 5 November 2009, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval.
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,

' £€inds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has
commented.to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
Favorable action.
ec. The page lla on which the contested entry appears also
includes uncontested entries.

‘CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error warranting the following
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page lla (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”)
entry dated 10 May 2004. This is to be accomplished. by
_. reconstructing the page lia on which the entry appears, or | 7
- completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, vather ~~
‘than merely lining through it. -

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or _
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or...
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal.
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)} it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Sine db Cats,

ROBERT D. ZASALMAN . . JONATHAN S.° RUSKIN —
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Fez wl DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10028-08

    Original file (10028-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Nofziger and Messrs. Boyd and Washington, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 November 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09529-08

    Original file (09529-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page lib (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 13 June 2006, a copy of which is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Ivins and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2008, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06852-12

    Original file (06852-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry 8 February 2005, the page 11 entry dated 4/7/05 regarding violation of Article 128 (Uniform Code of Military Justice), and the page lla entry...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00700-09

    Original file (00700-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Colbert and Messrs. Storz and Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 April 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), the HOMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s request to remove the service record page llb entry has commented to the effect that this...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11291-09

    Original file (11291-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 © (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 8 February 2007, a copy of which is in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Garst, Leeman and ,.Mann, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2009, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08954-09

    Original file (08954-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 17 January 2008 {two, concerning the January and February 2008 sergeant promotion periods) and 29 February 2008 (concerning the March 2008 sergeant promotion period) with his undated rebuttal. The Board,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08097-08

    Original file (08097-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No. 8097-08 2 April 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy faeces Sub):

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03649-09

    Original file (03649-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference fa), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing the gervice record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 2 August 2007, a copy of which is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ") entry dated 2 August...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06143-01

    Original file (06143-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 la (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 10 March 1998. Staff Sergean not assigned to the w 6100.10. and 980301 through 98103'0 do not a e. Upon the completion of enclosure (4) to MC0 6100.10, a page MC0 11 entry is authorized...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02283-09

    Original file (02283-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the weight control entry for 24 January 2007 to 00000000; changing the “Proficiency” /"Conduct” marks for 31 July 2007, 31 January 2008 and 31 July 2008; and removing the lined through undated service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")} entry and the page 11...