DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JSR
Docket No. 9529-08
20 November 2008
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Sib] : SIRs aan neae ner Wp re
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 15 Sep 08 w/attachment
(2) HQMC MIO memo dtd 14 Nov 08
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the service record page lib
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 13 June 2006, a
copy of which is in enclosure (1) at Tab A.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Ivins and
Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 20 November 2008, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has
commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
b. The page 11a on which the contested entry appears also
includes uncontested entries.
c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has
commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION :
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
the undated service record page lla (“Administrative Remarks
(1070)”) counseling entry concerning alleged “unsatisfactory
performance and lack of professionalism while being assigned as
a processing NCO in the operations section of the Syracuse, New
York MEPS [Official Military Personnel File service - contracts
folder, image 32].” This is to be accomplished by
reconstructing the page 1la on which the entry appears, or
completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, rather
than merely lining through the entry.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
Din thins fh KCraky
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03374-08
3374-08 17 July 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: ¢ Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Subject, filed enclosure (1) with that the applicable naval e service record page 11 (a) entry dated 2 February 2008, a 2. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04809-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 5 February and 6 March 2002. The Board, consisting of Ms. Guill and Messrs. McBride and Shy, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 August 2008, and pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08097-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No. 8097-08 2 April 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy faeces Sub):
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04821-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 19 July 2006, a copy of which is the last document at enclosure (2). That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 19 July 2006. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09450-08
Petitioner also requested removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 23 August 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Ms. Prevatt and and Messrs. Bourgeois and Mann, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 October 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That any material or entries inconsistent with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10028-08
The Board, consisting of Ms. Nofziger and Messrs. Boyd and Washington, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 November 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00700-09
The Board, consisting of Ms. Colbert and Messrs. Storz and Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 April 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), the HOMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s request to remove the service record page llb entry has commented to the effect that this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10092-08
In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that removal of the undated page 11 entry referencing training on 9 February 2004 and the page 11 (a) entry dated 26 June 2008 is warranted because these entries were not signed by the commanding officer, but that the remaining entries should stand because a page 11 entry is required when a Marine is not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04206-09
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070})"} entry dated 27 July 2005 and her undated rebuttal. That her record be corrected further by removing the service record page 11 entry dated 24 October 2005. c. That her record be corrected further by modifying the service record page 11 entry dated 11 April 2005 by removing “This has been your second offense of search [sic] nature.” d. That any material or entries...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9043 13
d. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), MIO, the HOMC office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's case, has commented to the effect that the request warrants partial relief, specifically, modification of the contested entry to remove “,which resulted in you being relieved for cause”. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries...