Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11291-09
Original file (11291-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS,
2 NAVY ANNEA
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JSR
Docket No. 11291-09
10 December 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Sub}: SE RGRA mere usc, qnciliiiiiie
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

   

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 8 Oct 09 w/attachments
(2} HQOMC MIO memo dtd 16 Nov 09 w/enclosure
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 ©
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 8 February 2007, a
copy of which is in enclosure (1).

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Garst, Leeman and ,.Mann,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10
December 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record, Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows: ,

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has
commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the
following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")
entry dated 8 February 2007. This is to be accomplished by
physically removing the page 11 on which the entry appears, or
completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, rather
than merely lining through it.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6{c)}) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

PAT On 4, toh Dn,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

\ a ne

Seer

Foz_W. DEAN P FFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00700-09

    Original file (00700-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Colbert and Messrs. Storz and Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 April 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), the HOMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s request to remove the service record page llb entry has commented to the effect that this...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02283-09

    Original file (02283-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the weight control entry for 24 January 2007 to 00000000; changing the “Proficiency” /"Conduct” marks for 31 July 2007, 31 January 2008 and 31 July 2008; and removing the lined through undated service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")} entry and the page 11...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03649-09

    Original file (03649-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference fa), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing the gervice record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 2 August 2007, a copy of which is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ") entry dated 2 August...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04576-09

    Original file (04576-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) counseling entry dated 28 December 2007 and his rebuttal dated 31 December 2007, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tab Piss 2. The Board also finds that Petitioner’s rebuttal should be modified by removing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10328-09

    Original file (10328-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page lla (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 10 May 2004, a copy of which is at Tab A. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page lla (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 10 May 2004. That any material or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08954-09

    Original file (08954-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 17 January 2008 {two, concerning the January and February 2008 sergeant promotion periods) and 29 February 2008 (concerning the March 2008 sergeant promotion period) with his undated rebuttal. The Board,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08097-08

    Original file (08097-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No. 8097-08 2 April 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy faeces Sub):

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04206-09

    Original file (04206-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070})"} entry dated 27 July 2005 and her undated rebuttal. That her record be corrected further by removing the service record page 11 entry dated 24 October 2005. c. That her record be corrected further by modifying the service record page 11 entry dated 11 April 2005 by removing “This has been your second offense of search [sic] nature.” d. That any material or entries...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05302-09

    Original file (05302-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 24 December 2008 and his rebuttal dated 6 January 2009, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tab A. . b.. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10092-08

    Original file (10092-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that removal of the undated page 11 entry referencing training on 9 February 2004 and the page 11 (a) entry dated 26 June 2008 is warranted because these entries were not signed by the commanding officer, but that the remaining entries should stand because a page 11 entry is required when a Marine is not...