DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JSR
Docket No. 8097-08
2 April 2009
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
faeces
Sub): <——=7rRhh iE
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 19 Aug 08 w/attachments
and Subject’s ltr dtd 4 Nov 08 w/enclosure
(2) HQMC MIO memo dtd 20 Mar 09
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the service record page 11
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 8 May and 22
July 2003. A copy of the page 11 on which both contested
entries appear is at Tab A.
2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Colbert and Messrs. Storz and
Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
2 April 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has
commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”)
entries dated 8 May and 22 July 2003. This is to be
accomplished by physically removing the page 11 on which the
entries appear, or completely obliterating the entries so they
cannot be read, rather than merely lining through the entries.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
7 a) rp
Paulina ff. 0 erA~
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
Te etalh
For_W. DEAN PFE on
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04206-09
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070})"} entry dated 27 July 2005 and her undated rebuttal. That her record be corrected further by removing the service record page 11 entry dated 24 October 2005. c. That her record be corrected further by modifying the service record page 11 entry dated 11 April 2005 by removing “This has been your second offense of search [sic] nature.” d. That any material or entries...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09918-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that her naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 20 June 2008 and her rebuttal of the same date, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tab A. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11543-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BUG Docket No: 11543-08 9 March 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Enclosure (3) clarifies the basis for the recommendation to remove the weight control entry for 10 February 1993 to 4 October 1996 and the page lid entry dated 27 January 2003. That any material or entries inconsistent with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10092-08
In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that removal of the undated page 11 entry referencing training on 9 February 2004 and the page 11 (a) entry dated 26 June 2008 is warranted because these entries were not signed by the commanding officer, but that the remaining entries should stand because a page 11 entry is required when a Marine is not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04809-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 5 February and 6 March 2002. The Board, consisting of Ms. Guill and Messrs. McBride and Shy, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 August 2008, and pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03374-08
3374-08 17 July 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: ¢ Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Subject, filed enclosure (1) with that the applicable naval e service record page 11 (a) entry dated 2 February 2008, a 2. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06893-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed-enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 5 April to 31 December 2006 (denied on 20 March 2008, docket number 1029-08), 1 January to 31 December 2007, 1 January to 26 May 2008, 27 May to 30 June 2008, 1 July to 26 September 2008, 27 September to 31 December 2008, 1 January to 8 May 2009 and 9 May to 31...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00700-09
The Board, consisting of Ms. Colbert and Messrs. Storz and Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 April 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), the HOMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s request to remove the service record page llb entry has commented to the effect that this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9043 13
d. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), MIO, the HOMC office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's case, has commented to the effect that the request warrants partial relief, specifically, modification of the contested entry to remove “,which resulted in you being relieved for cause”. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04821-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 19 July 2006, a copy of which is the last document at enclosure (2). That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 19 July 2006. ...