DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JSR
Docket No. 10028-08
14 November 2008
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj : a ; ~ A ne on o er E LEN,
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 5 Feb 07 w/attachments
(2) HOMC MIO memo dtd 6 Nov 08
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the undated service record page
lla (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) counseling entry
concerning alleged “unsatisfactory performance and lack of
professionalism while being assigned as a processing NCO
[noncommissioned officer] in the operation section of the
Syracuse, New York MEPS [Military Entrance Processing Station],”
a copy of which is at Tab A.
2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nofziger and Messrs. Boyd and
Washington, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 14 November 2008, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. The page 1la on which the contested entry appears also
includes uncontested entries.
c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has
commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
the undated service record page lla (“Administrative Remarks
(1070)”) counseling entry concerning alleged “unsatisfactory
performance and lack of professionalism while being assigned as
a processing NCO in the operations section of the Syracuse, New
York MEPS [Official Military Personnel File service - contracts
folder, image 32].” This is to be accomplished by
reconstructing the page 1la on which the entry appears, or
completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, rather
than merely lining through the entry.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
Sas cas ; vo gino
prt , ee SU
‘ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09529-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page lib (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 13 June 2006, a copy of which is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Ivins and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2008, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10328-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page lla (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 10 May 2004, a copy of which is at Tab A. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page lla (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 10 May 2004. That any material or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06852-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry 8 February 2005, the page 11 entry dated 4/7/05 regarding violation of Article 128 (Uniform Code of Military Justice), and the page lla entry...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06143-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 la (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 10 March 1998. Staff Sergean not assigned to the w 6100.10. and 980301 through 98103'0 do not a e. Upon the completion of enclosure (4) to MC0 6100.10, a page MC0 11 entry is authorized...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04804-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the undated service record page 11(d) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry documenting a nonjudicial punishment of an unspecified date, a copy of which igs in enclosure...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08954-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 17 January 2008 {two, concerning the January and February 2008 sergeant promotion periods) and 29 February 2008 (concerning the March 2008 sergeant promotion period) with his undated rebuttal. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10092-08
In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that removal of the undated page 11 entry referencing training on 9 February 2004 and the page 11 (a) entry dated 26 June 2008 is warranted because these entries were not signed by the commanding officer, but that the remaining entries should stand because a page 11 entry is required when a Marine is not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08514-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 1 August 2005 and her undated rebuttal, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tab A.2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Willis and Messrs. Grover and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4745 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O! c. Enclosure (2), the report of the HOMC PERB in Petitioner's case, shows that the PERB directed removing the contested fitness report for 1 January to 27 April 2008, but commented to the effect that the five remaining reports at issue should stand. In enclosure (5), Petitioner provided new evidence in support of his new request to remove the page 11 entries dated 11 June 2010 and 12 May 2011. g. In enclosures (6) and (7),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07981-02
07981-02 18 August 2003 Sub j : -USMCR, - From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Commandant, United States Marine Corps REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Enclosure BRIAN J. GEORGE By direction DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 BJG Docket No: 7981-02 18 August 2003 From: To: Subj : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy s o Y l l l s l l J E...