DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100
HD :hd
Docket No. 04366-09
5 February 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552. You requested that block 20
("Physical Readiness") of the enlisted performance evaluation
report for 16 March to 15 October 2005.be changed from "F
[failed physical readiness test (PRT)]/WS [within weight /body
fat standards]" to "M [medically waived from PRT] /Ws."
BR three-member panei of the Board for Correction of Naval.
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 February 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinions furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval
Operations dated 17 June 2009 with enclosure and the Navy
Personnel Command dated 26 June 2009, copies of which are
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinions.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request. ,
It is regretted that the. circumstances of your case are such
‘that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. er Tk
Executive D r
Enclosures
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 10090-04
You requested, in effect, that the entry in block 20 (“Physical Readiness”) of the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 March 2000 to 15 March 2001 be changed from “P/NS” (passed physical readiness test (PRT)/ not within physical readiness standards) to “P/WS” (passed PRT/within physical readiness standards)A three--member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2005. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08345-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04572-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2011. in this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion regarding the Cycle 2, 2006 PRT, and further observed that the earliest data currently appearing on PRIMS is for Cycle 1, 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01887-99
They recommended modifying blocks 20 and 36 as Petitioner originally requested, on the basis that he had provided documentation indicating he should have been medically waived from the PRT, but they concluded he had not provided sufficient justification for changing his promotion recommendation. As Petitioner now requests removal of the recommendation, rather than modification, and the evidence does not show what the recommendation would have been if he had been waived from the PRT, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03589-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2009. Sailor petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and/or remove injustices in her Physical Readiness Information Management System (PRIMS) record. This is an advisory memorandum for the use of the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10765-07
10765-07 29 July 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08128-97
member's petition revealed the report to be a not observed because of the member's status as a student. The report contains the required comment in Subj: L , USN, d. Further review of the member's headquarters record revealed a report for the period of 1 July 1996 to 31 January 1997. front of the document is reflected. The report on file is incomplete as only the Since the member included a e. Review of Pers-322 selection board support files revealed an advanced message was sent to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06804-06
06804-06 1 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2007. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnishedby the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 3 October 2006 with enclosure, a copy of which is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02597-09
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 30 May 1996, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of PRT failure. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09652-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2009. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized when a Sailor is discharged due to PRT failure and not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.