E
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
RDZ:ecb
Docket No. 10504-08
4 March 2009
This is in referen
naval record pursu
United States Code
A three-member pan
Records, sitting 1
application on 3 M
injustice were rev
regulations and pr
Board. Documentar
of your applicatio
support thereof, y
regulations and po
advisory opinion,
October 2008, a co
After careful and
record, the Board
insufficient to es
error or injustice.
concurred with the
Accordingly, your
votes of the membe
request.
It 1s regretted th
that favorable act
the Board reconsid
ce to your application for correction of your
ant to the provisions of title 10 of the
section 1552.
el of the Board for Correction of Naval
m executive session, considered your
arch 2009. Your allegations of error and
Lewed in accordance with administrative
ocedures applicable to the proceedings of this
lY evidence considered by the Board consisted
nm, together with all material submitted in
our naval record and applicable statutes,
licies. In addition, the Board considered the
from Headquarters, Marine Corps dated 27
oy of which is attached.
conscientious consideration of the entire
found that the evidence submitted was
tablish the existence of probable material
In this connection, the Board substantially
comments contained in the advisory opinion.
application has been denied. The names and
rs of the panel will be furnished upon
at the circumstances of your case are such
Lon cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
er its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of yegularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Enclosure
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13099-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 28 February 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01637-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference b, requires that all ISTs into the Marine Corps {reserve and active component) apply to the officer retention board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07813-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 3 and 22 September 2008, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04025-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a} for use by the Board ‘for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10386-08
concurred with the Accordingly, your votes of the membe request. Your allegations of error and Zewed in accordance with administrative locedures applicable to the proceedings of this lY evidence considered by the Board consisted In, together with all material submitted in our naval record and applicable statutes, licies. Consequently, when|applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00496-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 17 December 2009. In view of the above, the Board again voted to deny relief. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04366-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 17 June 2009 with enclosure and the Navy Personnel Command dated 26 June 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05202-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26/ February 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 2 July 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00678-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Marine’s signature on the DD Form 1299 and DD Form 1787 both dated 23 January 2008 is proof that the Marine was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07133-09
Documentary material “considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when ‘applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 5, This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.