DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD:hd
Docket No: 04644-03
12 September 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 11 September 2003.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated
7 July 2003, a copy of which is attached. The Board also considered your letter dated
21 August 2003.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. The Board was unable to find Ensign
instructions that caused you to crash a trainer, or that he took any other actions that precluded
your receiving a commission. In view of the above, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
F--- gave you erroneous
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE
NAV)’ PERSONNEL COMMAND
8720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON. TN 380550000
NAVY
REFER To
IN REPLY
5420
PERS-911
7 Jul 03
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
WAVAT.
m7m-mnc
Via:
Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)
Subj
:
Ref:
Encl:
OR COMMENTS AND
FORMER MEMBER,
REC
USN
(a) BCNR memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 1 Jul 03
(1) BCNR File 04644-03
Per reference (a),
enclosure (1) is returned with the
1.
following comments and recommendations.
petitioning to have his records corrected
stationed at Kingsville, Texas,
commissioned an ensign in the Naval Reserve.
to the length of time since he was a member of the Navy, we
recommend his petitions be denied.
Limitations would seem to apply in this case.
and is requesting to be
BCNR's Statute of
S
to show he was
Regrettably, due
Consequently,
We noticed enclosure (1) does not contain the member's
it is difficult to
There has never been a requirement that the member's
If his
2.
archived official record.
determine if there are specific omissions that should be
corrected.
flight log match his official personnel records.
official record is available and there is something blatantly
out of order, we interpose no objection to a corrective remar
being placed in the files.
file that will never be seen or used again, some
return to civilian status, serves no purpose.
3.
does not meet any of the requirements for appoint
In regard to appointment in the Naval
Otherwise,
Reserve
revisiting a personnel
57 years after
k
please contact
Personnel'Administration
Division
r, Naval Reserve
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04354-02
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Pers attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (c) authorized the summer training of an officer as a non-academy midshipman as creditable service under section 1405 of reference (d).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01161-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) is returned with the following comments and request for an receive a Reserve a former Naval Officer, is requesting an 2. appointment in the Naval Reserve.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06557-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The FMS required for advancement to MS2 for that cycle was 181.58. in the March 1994 (Cycle 143) Navywide 3.-was credited with 4 award points for Cycle 143.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02248-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Therefore, we can not recommend just adding 126 days active duty to his Statement of Service for his Naval Reserve Retirement Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN CASE OF unless we have documentation in order to support...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00445-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05391-01
is returned with the recommendation that CAPT sure request, to add 126 days of additional active duty to his Statement of Service for Naval Reserve retirement, be denied. Therefore, this service, when performed, should have been documented in the member's permanent personnel record. s permanent personnel record contains no such orders, nor As an NROTC midshipmen Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02243-01
~ l l members of the Ready Reserve (including the Individual Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, whether or not they are actively participating. Per Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 1407, a lieutenant commander who has at least twice failed of selection and has completed 20 years of commissioned service must transfer to the Retired Reserve, if eligible, or be discharged. 0 was notified, per reference (c) , that he had become subject to the attrition...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05388-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Inactive) status when you were Sl (Standby-Reserve Active) status on 6 August 1996, as you had expressed no The Board found it would not have been appropriate for cognizant naval authorities to bring up the possibility of transferring you to S2 (Standby Reserve transferred to interest in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08012-02
& accordance with administrative regulations and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. (1) BCNR memo !5420 PERS-OOZCB of 5 Nov 02 Enclosure (1) is returned with the recommendation that CAPT s request to add 30 days of additional active duty to his ement of Service for Naval Reserve retirement, be denied. training periods held annually for NROTC midshipmen students as creditable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09274-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 19 March and 4 and 12 June 2003, copies of which are attached. c. The Bureau of Naval Personnel cannot arbitrarily change the ranking of a member on a “ double ranking ”.It is apparent the member ’s record was changed “Bupers subsequently mandated he provide a fitness report. The member ’s previous report for the period 8 December 1990 to 3 1 October 1991 ranked the member as 3 of 11,...