DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
HD: hd
Docket No: 00445-00
9 February 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 February 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the two advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command, one
undated and the other dated 19 July 2000, copies of which are attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the undated advisory opinion. Since they found insufficient basis to remove your failures
by the Fiscal Year 99 and 00 Naval Reserve Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Boards,
they had no grounds to set aside your discharge from the Naval Reserve on 31 March 2000.
In view of the above, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
:
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
_-
Enclosures
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
Y
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Assistant for BCNR Matters
(PERS-OOZCB)
Via:
Subj:
Encl:
(1) BCNR File 00445-00 w/Service Record
1 .
Lieutenan
selection
We are returning enclosure (1) with the recommendation that
quest for removal of two failures of
and reaffiliation with the Naval Reserve be denied.
5420
PERS-86
_-
Lieutenant
sserts that he was never informed that
an S-2 status while in the Active Status
It is our opinion that he should have been aware of his
2.
he needed to reques
Pool.
status and opportunity for promotion while in the Individual
Ready Reserve.
maintaining an active stat
notified of his separation.
owed no interest in
aval Reserve until he was
Lieutenant
Lieutenan
3.
his record an
his petition does not detract from h
nation and the United States Navy.
n be justifiably proud of
s; the negative response to
ice to this
Promotions,
Enlisted Advancement Division
Appointments, and
DEPARTMENT OF THE
NAV Y
NAVY PE R SO N NEL COMM A N D
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
5420
PERS-91
19 Jul 00
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Subj:
Assistant for BCNR Matters
(PERS-OOZCB)
RECO
SNR,
OF
Encl:
(1) BCNR file 00445-00 w/Service Record
We concur with the comments and recommendation of
PERS-
1.
86.
Director,
Administration Division
Naval Reserve Personnel
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07117-00
Your allegations of error and Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. as a Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve since the date of his commission and therefore was never eligible for a date of rank adjustment. e Active Status List erved continuously activ Reserve...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03920-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08156-00
sine Chapter 15 contains the responsibilities “Each officer is responsible for ensuring Paragraph 15-5 states; “A ll officers should periodically review their official If eligible for consideration by a selection board, this review should be co months prior to the convening date to allow time for correction of discrepancies. Per reference (a), enclosure at former s requesting to have his honorable discharge (1) is returned with the petition be denied. time of his honorable discharge A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05662-00
The Board found that even if you had been considered by the Mobilization Disposition Board, and you had been - Inactive status as a result of approval of a board occurred until after the Fiscal Year (FY) 00 Naval Reserve Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Board had adjourned. recommendation again th is requesting removal 0 promotion to lieutenant original opinion stating that he transferred to Standby 19 May 1999 Naval Reserve Officer Mobilization Disposition Board. tha would have been a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08509-00
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Shy and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 April 2001, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. They say the only action required of Petitioner to return to active duty or the Ready Reserve, if this correction is approved, is to request a Naval Reserve commission and submit a Ready Reserve service agreement to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01679-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2002. The Board was likewise unable to find that the Commander, Naval Surface Reserve Force denied your right to an interview with him; that he inadequately reviewed the DFC documentation; or that he wrongfully concurred with and forwarded the DFC recommendation. Since the Board found that the DFC and related fitness report should stand, they had no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08353-01
They stated ” They further stated “By waiting until 1 October 2001, her Air Force promotion to Command (NPC) office having cognizance over Naval Reserve personnel administration, has commented to the effect that Petitioner the Naval Reserve Lieutenant Commander promotion list “From the documentation provided in [her application at enclosure (l)], it is apparent the member was given inappropriate counsel as to the timing of her appointment into the Naval Reserve. They find Petitioner ’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00511-01
considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 5 April, 23 July and 16 August 2001, copies of which are attached. The member requests the removal of the following fitness reports. performance and making recommendations concerning promotion and assignment are the responsibilities of the reporting senior.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03638-02
following comments and recommendation concerning request that her date of transfer to Standby Reserve-Inactive (USNR-S2) status be changed from 31 August 2000 to 1997 and all failures of selection that date be removed. After her release from active duty, she entered the Individual Ready Reserve the Naval Reserve. Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, regardless of their active participation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02290-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an official...