DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD: hd
Docket No: 01161-03
8 September 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 28 August 2003.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated
1 April 2003 and the Memorandum for the Record dated 2 1 August 2003,
copies of which are attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that’favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
DEPAf%TWlEfdT
N AVY
OF
COMMAND
PERSONNEL
IWE
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN
38055-0000
NAV-Y
5420
Pers-911C
01 Apr 03
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Assistant for BCNR Matters
(Pers-OOZCB)
Via:
Subj:
(1) BCNR memo 5420 Pers-OOZCB of 13 Mar 03
Encl:
1.
recommendations concernin
opportunity to take an Oa
Commission.
Enclosure (1) is returned with the following comments and
request for an
receive a Reserve
a former Naval Officer, is requesting an
2.
appointment in the Naval Reserve.
for a BCNR directed appointment be denied based on the following
information.
A Naval Reserve
Reserve appointment in his resignation letter.
appointment was subsequently mailed on 22 July 1998 to Training
In his petition he states that he requested a Naval
We recommend that his petition
REE in Milton, FL, but was never returned.
ates that his separat
ment because he had n
Upon his separation
MS?.
cted acceptance of
s service
had completed 8
which exceeds the
years, 8 months and 4 days of mili
8 years military service obligation required by law.
Y
Had he taken any initiative to obtain a commission within
Although he was separated in November 1998,
3.
didn't express an interest in the Naval Reserve
2003.
three years of separation, one would have been tendered, provided
he met all other standards.
applying for appointment, however, he was correctly informed that
he must meet current recruiting quota needs, in order to pursue
We urge him
appointment via a Direct Commission Officer Program.
to visit a local Naval Reserve recruiter to further explore this
option.
4. If
contact
Because he waited so long before
Naval Reserve Personnel
Administration Division
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
HD:hd
Dock&f No.
21 August 2003
91161-03
This memorandum for the record is to document a phone conversation
Subj:
1.
between this staff member and 'the subject name individual.
2.
and that
I should take his case to the Board as is.
tidicated
to me that he had nothing further to offer
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05214-98
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 12 and 16 April 1999, copies of which are attached. Until 1 September 1995, as a member of the Ready Reserve, and as such, W= be considered by promotion - - selection boards. A complete review of Lieutenant Commander record reveals that there were no properly considered during either failure of selection per reference (c).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05388-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Inactive) status when you were Sl (Standby-Reserve Active) status on 6 August 1996, as you had expressed no The Board found it would not have been appropriate for cognizant naval authorities to bring up the possibility of transferring you to S2 (Standby Reserve transferred to interest in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05015-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 HD: hd Docket No: 0501501 15 October 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD USN Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. e. That any material or entries inconsistent with the Board ’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner ’s record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04644-03
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 7 July 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. petitioning to have his records corrected stationed at Kingsville, Texas, commissioned an ensign in the Naval Reserve.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9805214
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 12 and 16 April 1999, copies of which are attached. Per reference (b), lieutenant commanders in an active status who have at least twice failed of selection and have attained 20 years of actual commissioned service must be retired or separated from the Naval Reserve. Director, Naval Reserve Personnel Administration Division
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02243-01
~ l l members of the Ready Reserve (including the Individual Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, whether or not they are actively participating. Per Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 1407, a lieutenant commander who has at least twice failed of selection and has completed 20 years of commissioned service must transfer to the Retired Reserve, if eligible, or be discharged. 0 was notified, per reference (c) , that he had become subject to the attrition...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00445-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01679-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2002. The Board was likewise unable to find that the Commander, Naval Surface Reserve Force denied your right to an interview with him; that he inadequately reviewed the DFC documentation; or that he wrongfully concurred with and forwarded the DFC recommendation. Since the Board found that the DFC and related fitness report should stand, they had no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03343-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by changing the date of acceptance of his commission as a lieutenant, U. S. Naval Reserve from 22 December 1998 to 2 February 1998, the day after he left active duty; and that his lieutenant date of rank be changed accordingly from 2 February 1997 to 1 June 1996 (the date of rank he originally...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08353-01
They stated ” They further stated “By waiting until 1 October 2001, her Air Force promotion to Command (NPC) office having cognizance over Naval Reserve personnel administration, has commented to the effect that Petitioner the Naval Reserve Lieutenant Commander promotion list “From the documentation provided in [her application at enclosure (l)], it is apparent the member was given inappropriate counsel as to the timing of her appointment into the Naval Reserve. They find Petitioner ’s...