Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02357-03
Original file (02357-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 2357-03
24 June 2003

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 24 June 2003.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum  
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice

1160 Ser 8 

l/261 of 16 May 2003, a copy of which is
1 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL  COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

1160
Ser 
811/261
16 May 2003

MEMORANDUM FOR 

CBAIRMAN,  BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO

Ref:

(a) SNM'S DD Form  149 dtd 07 Mar 03

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference 

1.
petitioner's request.

(a), recommend disapproval to the

The petitioner's status has been USNR Branch Class 32 since his
Additionally,

2.
entry into the Navy Service since 19 March 1971.
petitioner was
general
December 1999.

assignment

authorized 

USNR(Active)

the
recall in

This is an advisory memorandum to reference

3.
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
returned.

(a) for use by the
Enclosure (1) is

Reenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09974-02

    Original file (09974-02.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81 attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, per reference The petitioner was participating in the officer program at the time 5. of reenlistment, therefore the member is not eligible for the remaining zone "A" entitlement.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05110-03

    Original file (05110-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner requests to receive-the The petitioner ‘C" SRB reenlistment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03

    Original file (06337-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for the LSRB UIC 44321. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for' the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05675-03

    Original file (05675-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05127-03

    Original file (05127-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was selected to the STA-21 officer program in October 2001. The petitioner requests to receive SRB offered in reference (b) based on the reenlistment of 19 July 2002.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07709-02

    Original file (07709-02.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06213-06

    Original file (06213-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2O37O~51OOLCCDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 4811/635, 3 November 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05848-03

    Original file (05848-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) listed a zone 'C" SRB entitlement for the MA rate at the time the petitioner received BUPERS order 2402. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09543-06

    Original file (09543-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/731 dtd 18 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08590-02

    Original file (08590-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (c), sailor may reenlist anytime within the same fiscal year The petitioner's EAOS is 17 May 2003, which is in the Per In view of the above, recommend the petitioner record remain as 2. is. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.