Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03636-99
Original file (03636-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T  O F  T H E  N A V Y  
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 

2 NAVY ANNEX 

WASHINGTON DC  20370-51 00 

LCC: tj 
Docket No:  3636-99 
10 August  1999 

Dear  LANCE CORPORAL 

This is in  reference to your application  for correction of your naval record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A  three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered your application on  10 August  1999.  Your allegations of  error and  injustice 
were reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all material submitted in  support thereof,  your naval  record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  CMC  memorandum  140013 MMPR-2 of  19 July  1999, a copy of  which  is 
attached. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record,  the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly,  your application has been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the members of  the panel will be furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted  that the circumstances of  your case are such  that  favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to  have the Board  reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter not  previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to keep in  mind that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 
MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT 

HARRY LEE HALL,  17 LEJEUNE ROAD 

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA  22134-5 104 

IN REPLY REFER TO 
1400/3 
MMPR-2 
19 Jul 99 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Subi:  ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE LANCE CORPORAL 

Ref: 

(a) DD Form 149 of 5 May 99 
(b) MCO PI400 .'32B (Enlisted Promotion Manual) 

1.  Through reference (a) , Lance corporal 
remedial consideration for the backdate of his promotion to private 
first class with backpay.  He states he was not recommended for 
promotion to private first class for 1 July 1998 because he was 
assigned to weight control.  He further states that although he 
signed a page 11 entry of acknowledgment, it was not reported in 
the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) therefore he feels that 
he rated the promotion to private first class for 1 July 1998 with 
backpay. 

has requested 

2 .   Although the assignment to weight control was not entered in 
the MCTFS, it is evident in Lance corporal- 
that he signed a page 11 entry on two occasions  (980701 and 980722) 
to acknowledge the nonrecommendation for promotion to private first 
class due to his assignment to weight control.  Per paragraph 
1204.3 of reference (b), it states that the assignment to weight 
control is a promotion restriction, therefore he was not eligible 
for promotion. 

service record 

3.  In view of the information contained in paragraph 2 aI:,rwe, 
recommend his petition be denied. 

Promotion Branch 
By direction of 
the Commandant of the Marine Corps 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03623-99

    Original file (03623-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Unit Diary action has been taken by this Headquarters to correct the PFC date of rank to its proper effective date as...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07204-98

    Original file (07204-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 January 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 140013 MMPR-2 of 8 December 1998, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03951-02

    Original file (03951-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. request contains two prior service with the same date phonecon with Per a time of was discharged...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04908-99

    Original file (04908-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 5 May 1998 Petitioner was erroneously assigned to the Promotion photos dated 25 February 1998 weight control program. report was removed from his record on 22 April 1999. enclosure (4). See This h. On 26 February 1999 Petitioner requested remedial consideration for promotion to staff sergeant based on the removal of the erroneous remark pertaining to being in the weight control program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01049-06

    Original file (01049-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF In order to be promoted to lance corporal, a Marine must have at least eight months time in grade.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05934-03

    Original file (05934-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely,, Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06097-02

    Original file (06097-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03823-03

    Original file (03823-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MCTFS and medical records supports her commander's action that appears to have followed appropriate administrative procedures when she was assigned to the weight control program on 19970818. The ACHCP commented on her medical The information recorded to her However, the Marine Corps Subj: SE OF CORPORA b. It may be possible that an entry was entered in her medical records to support her initial assignment, not available in her application.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02208-00

    Original file (02208-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2000. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00999

    Original file (MD02-00999.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of DD Form 215 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 961025 - 961103 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 961104 Date of Discharge: 991222 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 01 19 Inactive: None 991203: Commanding...