Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04214-99
Original file (04214-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T  O F  T H E  N A V  
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 

2 N A W  ANNEX 

WASHINGTON DC  20370-5100 

LCC: tj 
Docket  No:  42 14-99 
17 August  1999 

This is in  reference to your application  for correction of  you 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code,  section  155: 

-  naval  record  pursuant to the 

A three-member panel  of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval 
session, considered your application on  17 August  1999.  Yc 
were  reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considera 
application, together with  all  material submitted in  support tl 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the  Board  considered  the advisory 
opinion furnished by  CMC Memorandum  140013 MMPR-2  f 28 July  1999, a copy of  which  is 
attached. 

Records,  sitting in  executive 
ur  allegations of  error and  injustice 
and  procedures applicable to the 
by  the Board  consisted of  your 
ereof, your naval  record  and 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire r  ord,  the Board  found that  the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to  establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurr  with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your application  has bee  denied.  The names and  votes of 

the  members of  the panel  will  be  furnished upon  request. r 
f 

It is regretted that the circumstances of  your case are such  that  favorable action cannot be  taken. 
You  are entitled to  have the Board  reconsider its decision  u  n  submission of  new  and  material 
ard.  In  this regard, it is important 
evidence or other matter not previously considered  by  the 
1 official records.  Consequently, 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity  attaches to 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record,  t  e burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable  material error or injus ice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF T H E  NAVY 
HEADQUARTERS  U N I T E D  S ~ A T E S  MARINE 

C 3 R P S  

3280 R U S S E L L  ROAD 

QUANTICO,  VIRGINIA  22 134-5 103 

IN R E P L Y  R E F E R  TO: 

1400/3 
MMPR - 2 
28 Jul 99 

MEMORRNDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARS FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Subj :  ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF 0 

I 

k 

Ref:  (a) Pl4OO. 32A  (Enlisted Promotion Manual) 

- 

properly promoted to lance corporal with a 

1. -was 
date of rank of 2 September 1993 and effective date of 1 October 
1993.  Marines who are meritoriously promoted as a result of being an 
honor graduate at recruit training or formal schools are properly 
promoted for pay purposes effective the date of graduation.  The date 
of rank is adjusted to the second day of the month, however, for pay 
purposes the effective date cannot be antedated. 

2.  Per paragraph 2400.5 of the reference, I n  eritorious promotions to 
PFC and LCpl effected under the provisions of Section 2 of Chapter 4 
are not entitled to remedial adjustment of their effective dates of 
promotion for pay purposes.  These promotions are properly effected 
for pay under the special provisions provided which do not normally 
occur on the 1st day of a month; therefore, they should not be 
misinterpreted as an administrative error b  the command. 

3.  Since 
effective 
denied. 

ler 1993, the 
his petition 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03044-99

    Original file (03044-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2000 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03535-99

    Original file (03535-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of confidential file maintained for such purpose, with Petitioner's naval record. DEPARTMENT OF T H E NAVY HEADQUARTERS U N I T E D STATES MARINE RPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 134-5 103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1600 MMOA- 4 12 Jul 99 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS FOR FIRST LIEUTENAN C Ref: (a) MMER...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00229-01

    Original file (00229-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03152-99

    Original file (03152-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 1997 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2000 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. He...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00570-99

    Original file (00570-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS U N I T E D STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 R U S S E L L ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 1 3 4 - 5 1 0 3 IN REPY2vy: MMPR-2 24 Dec 98 Subj: REQUEST FOR REMEDIAL CONSIDERATION FOR PROMOTION Per your Administrative Action Form of September...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05707-99

    Original file (05707-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's request to strike his failure of selection for promotion has commented to the effect that this request has merit and warrants favorable action. Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness reports: Date of Report Re~ortinq Senior Period of Report 29 Jan 87 21 Oct 87 28...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00337-02

    Original file (00337-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 1 February 2002, and a memorandum for the record (MFR) dated 11 March 2002, copies of which are attached. as listed with a d. Reference (c) states "...officers retired voluntarily shall be retired in th satisfactorily held ..." grade of Major effecti issioned officer grade luntarily retired in the e. Due t retirement on 990501, his selection to lieutenant colonel was nullified. Per references (d) and ( would...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02818-99

    Original file (02818-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing his NJP of 9 January 1997. b. In light of this Board's decision to remove the contested NJP, that Petitioner's application, to be forwarded by this Board, be returned to the HQMC PERB, as agreed to in enclosure (2), for action on his request to correct his fitness report record. Naval Board of Correction of Military Records has jurisdiction to consider whether a former serviceman's military record should be corrected if it is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07204-98

    Original file (07204-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 January 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 140013 MMPR-2 of 8 December 1998, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02040-99

    Original file (02040-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Mathews, Mr. Dunn and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 July 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. The advisory opinion at enclosure (2) from Headquarters Marine Corps (MMSR-6J) recommends that Petitioner's record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve on 1 January 1999 vice being...