D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y
B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S
2 N A V Y A N N E X
W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
LCC:dc!j
Docket No: 7507-01
14 May 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 14 May 2002. Your allegations of error and illjustice were
reviewed in accortlance with atlniinistrat ive regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Docunwntary ~naterial considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all tilaterial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CMC ~nen~orandum 1500 CMT of 12 February 2002, a copy of which is
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of prohable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the menlbers of the panel will be fi~rnished upon request. -
I t is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
Yo11 are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon subniission of new and niaterial
In this regard, it is important
evidence or other matter not previoi~sly considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable niaterial error or ir~justice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADOUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3 2 8 0 RUSSELL ROAD
OUANTICO. VIRGINIA 22134-5103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1500
CMT
12 Feb 02
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS
OF NAVAL RECORDS
IN THE CASE OF
Ref: (a) MCO P104 ::!-' . .: !. (RESERVE CAREER PLANNING MANUAL)
1. The following co ments are provided:
contract from the Marine Corps Reserve from 29 August 1997 to 30
May 2001. He subseq ently reenlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve
on 31 May 2001 for a period of 2 years and is currently serving
on that enlistment. CorporaL-
30 May 2003.
end of current contract is
was off
I"
Y
2. Per paragraph 5 1 P 4 . 2 ~ of the reference, an applicant
reenlisting in the M ~ r i n e Corps Reserve after a three year
separation will be a pointed to the grade held at time of
separation with the ate of rank matching the date of
reenlistment.
3. Corporal
as Corporal 1
of the reference, th$s office recommends that Corpor
date of rank as a ~okporal be kept as the date he re-
the Marine Corps ~es&rve, 31 May 2001.
s requesting that his original date of rank
6 be reinstated. Based on paragraph 5 1 0 4 . 2 ~
4. The point of con$act for this matter is Master Sergeant
-at
commercial-r
DSN: 278-0513.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03779-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2002. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. If proper documentation to support the entry of the reserve retirement credit points is provide w, this request will be reconsidered.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02101-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2003. Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness reports: Date of Report Reporting Senior Period of Report 13 Jul 88 9 Jan 89 Capt Capt P 880414 to 880704 (DC) 880705 to 881231 (SA) 2. The Commandant of the Marine Corps is not empowered to grant or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07770-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 April 2002. Docu~iientary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all niaterial subniitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted early on 29 September 2001 for four years at the request of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00817-02
In atldition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or In this connection, the Board substantially conct~rrec-1 with the co~ii~nents contained in injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable niaterial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00825-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. , .- - sed on the stated findings we see no need to reinstate*- "k time in service/grade.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04271-01
You requested that the fitness report for 10 May to 27 June 1998 be modified by removing the mark of “EX/OS” (excellent/outstanding, the second highest) in item 15a (your estimate of this Marine’s general value to the service) and the marks in items 15b and c (showing five captains ranked above you and one with you). In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Review Board HQMC dated 22 May 2001, copies of which are attached. Those a8 shown in ( o r Jy...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07571-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. b. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP. In some cases, members signed their DD Form 2057 indicating they could enroll at any time while on active duty.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00852-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:yrj Docket No: 852-02 18 June 2002 This is i n reference to your application for correction of your naval record pilrsuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material cunsitleretl by the Board consisted of your application, together with all nlaterial si~b~nitted applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06669-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2003. Sincerely, Executive Directo Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VlROlNlA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1600 CMT 8 Sep 03 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: RESERVE AFFAIRS ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION: CASE OF COLONEL USMCR 1. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02806-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Sul~ject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosi~re (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mackey, Pauling, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and i~ijustice on 9 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...