Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07839-02
Original file (07839-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE  NAVY
fiOfiRD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 7839-02
17 December 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 12 November 2002, a copy of which
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

uEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

N AVY 

PERSONNEL  COMMAN

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000

D

1780
PERS-604
12 Nov 02

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Ref:

Assistant for BCNR Matters 
REQUEST

(PERS-OOZCB)
FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO

(a) CNPC memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 28  
(b)  Title 38,

United States Code, Chapter 30

Ott  02

(MGIB)

Program.

eques
Sine

The following is provided in response to reference (a).

1.
Recommend denial of
the
Montgomery GI Bill
did not
provide any substantial evidence to supp
of
inaccurate information,
there is insufficient reason to believe
he was told if he wasn't going to sta
Review of
to decline enrollment.
record indicates he disenrolled fr
29 September 1987.
is irrevocable.
opportunity to enroll in the M
period" from 1 December 1988 through 30 June 1989 and he did not.
-who
2.

for 20 years
ster microfiche
ram on
eclsion  to disenroll

Per refere
Additionally,

had a second
during the 

of contact is Ms.

PERS-604's point

"open

can be

GI Bill Programs Branch
(PERS-604)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02563-02

    Original file (02563-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 2 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07842-02

    Original file (07842-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10927-02

    Original file (10927-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (b), the decision to disenroll is irrevocable.b.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07570-02

    Original file (07570-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07169-02

    Original file (07169-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The following is provided in response to reference (a): Recommend denial of Madntgomery GI Bill (MGIB the master microfiche record indicates he disenrolled from the MGIB Program on 19 June 1999. disenroll is irrevocable. Until Congress changes the law to allow members a opportunity to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02765-02

    Original file (02765-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS-604 of 14 June 2002, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02460-02

    Original file (02460-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Board. Program record accordingly. PERS-604 has corrected This was apparently an erroneous entry He may have received this information ce, Denver has for MGIB Program electronic MGIB money was collected for Accoun fro c. W declined enrollment in the MGIB Program in writing on 29 March 1991 and no money was collected for enrollment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05492-02

    Original file (05492-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 23 August 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08817-02

    Original file (08817-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01043-02

    Original file (01043-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Hoard for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2002. Documentary ~iiaterial considered by t lie Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof', your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations antl policies. A review of- master microfiche record indicates he disenrolled from the MGIB Program on 11 June 1990.