Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07842-02
Original file (07842-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVALRECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP : ddj
Docket No: 7842-02
17 December 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 12 November 2002, a copy of which
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

178 0
PERS-604
12 Nov 02

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

(a) CNPC memo
(b) Title 38,

Ott 02
5420 PERS-OOZCB of 28  
United States Code, Chapter 30

provided in response to reference (a).

The following is
1.
Recommend denial of  
Montgomery GI Bill
substantial evidence to support her claim of inaccurate
of'Imaster  microfiche record
information.
indicates she disenrolled from the MGIB Program on 26 June 2001.
Per reference (b),

the decision to disenroll is irrevocable.

equest to enroll in the

Program. 

41111[111%Re did not provide any

A review 

LT'
(MGIB

PERS-604's point of contact is MS2

2.
at (DSN) 882-4262 or (C) 901-87

who can be reached

tivities 

& 

_

Programs Branch

(PERS-604)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02563-02

    Original file (02563-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 2 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07169-02

    Original file (07169-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The following is provided in response to reference (a): Recommend denial of Madntgomery GI Bill (MGIB the master microfiche record indicates he disenrolled from the MGIB Program on 19 June 1999. disenroll is irrevocable. Until Congress changes the law to allow members a opportunity to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07839-02

    Original file (07839-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05492-02

    Original file (05492-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 23 August 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05347-02

    Original file (05347-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (b) the decision to enroll/disenroll in the MGIB Program is irrevocable.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04593-02

    Original file (04593-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02765-02

    Original file (02765-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS-604 of 14 June 2002, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02460-02

    Original file (02460-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Board. Program record accordingly. PERS-604 has corrected This was apparently an erroneous entry He may have received this information ce, Denver has for MGIB Program electronic MGIB money was collected for Accoun fro c. W declined enrollment in the MGIB Program in writing on 29 March 1991 and no money was collected for enrollment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08817-02

    Original file (08817-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02199-02

    Original file (02199-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    the Board considered the advisory 30 May 2002, a copy of which of‘ is conscientious consideration of ‘ the entire recortl, the Board found that the est:tblish the existence of probable material error or After careful and evidence submitted injustice. The names and votes of ot’ your It is regretted that the circumstances You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. request to enroll in the eview of cord indicates...