Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02765-02
Original file (02765-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

JLP: yrj
Docket No: 2765-02
16 July 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS-604 of 14 June 2002, a copy of which is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

NAVY 

PERSONNEL 

COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN  

3805.50000

Y

178 0
PERS-604
14 Jun 02

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

(a) CNPC memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 16 May 02
(b) 

United States Code, Chapter 30

T-itle  38,

The following i
1.
Recommend denial of
Montgomery GI Bill
master microfiche record indicates he
the MGIB Program on two separate occasions.
enrollment on   17 April 1994 upon entering the Armed Forces Health
Professions Scholarship Program.
enrollment on   18 June 
reference 

in response to reference (a).
request to enroll
A review of
elected t

(b), the decision to disenroll is irrevocable.

1998.after  being commissioned.

He again elected to decline

Per

2.
reached at  

PERS-604's point of contact
(DSN)  882-4260 or  

(C

ho can be

Branch 

(PERS-604)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02692-02

    Original file (02692-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I’EKS-604 tlic Board considered the advisory of‘ 24 May 2002, a copy of which is After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, naval record, the burden is on the applicant to Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV N A VY PERSONNEL C OMM AN D 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02199-02

    Original file (02199-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    the Board considered the advisory 30 May 2002, a copy of which of‘ is conscientious consideration of ‘ the entire recortl, the Board found that the est:tblish the existence of probable material error or After careful and evidence submitted injustice. The names and votes of ot’ your It is regretted that the circumstances You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. request to enroll in the eview of cord indicates...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04652-02

    Original file (04652-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. he Page 13 entry on her MGIB...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02563-02

    Original file (02563-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 2 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07937-01

    Original file (07937-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandu~n 1780 Pers 604 of l l January 2002, a copy of which is attached. c. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05492-02

    Original file (05492-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 23 August 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06757-01

    Original file (06757-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material consitleretl by the Boartl consisted of your application, together with all ~ilaterial suh~nittctl in support thereat', your niiviil record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Boartl considered the advisory I3 Noveliilw 2001. a copy of After careful and conscientioirs consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probahle material error or In this connection,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07306-01

    Original file (07306-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-niember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP. Members who initially entered active duty during the VEAP era were not eligible for MGIB Program enrollment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01043-02

    Original file (01043-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Hoard for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2002. Documentary ~iiaterial considered by t lie Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof', your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations antl policies. A review of- master microfiche record indicates he disenrolled from the MGIB Program on 11 June 1990.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04826-02

    Original file (04826-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...