Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02836-02
Original file (02836-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 2836-02
10 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 10 September 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811 of 2 May 2002, a copy of which is
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice were

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE

NAVY 

PERSONNEL COMMAN
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000

  NAV Y

D

1430
Ser 811
2 May  0 2

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)

Subj:

COMMENTS AND

F

Ref:

(a) BUPERSINST 

1430.16E

Encl:

(1) BCNR file 

#02836-02

Based on policy and guidelines established in reference

1.
(,a), enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

-8
L . Petty Officer
authorized by the
September' 2001 exam be backdated to the
March 2001 exam.
The basis for his request is that he was
not advanced to E-3 in time to participate in the March 2001
exam, due to missing advancement to E-3 by two days.

has requested his advancement,

There are no provisions to waiver time in rate for

3.
advancement to E-3.
granted concerning this petition.

A favorable endorsement can not be



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01164-02

    Original file (01164-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 LCCl:

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03424-02

    Original file (03424-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD ANNEX NAVY 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S LCC: yrj Docket No: 3424-02 16 July 2002 This is in reference to your provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10814-02

    Original file (10814-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 11 A attached. S requesting that if he is selected for advancement from the March 2003 exam that his advancement be backdated to September 2002 exam.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07412-02

    Original file (07412-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. GM2c is the entry on your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04472-05

    Original file (04472-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 481lE9/525, 17 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06744-01

    Original file (06744-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 11 of 7 December 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02366-01

    Original file (02366-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 11 of 4 December 2001, a copy of which is attached. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06094-01

    Original file (06094-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03875-01

    Original file (03875-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07210-01

    Original file (07210-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...