DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
.
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH:dd_j
Docket No:
14 May 2002
6619-01
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the
IJnited States Code, section
1.552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
session, considered your application on 14 May 2002.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations arid
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by COMNAVRESFOR memorandum
copy of which is attached.
Your allegations of error and injustice
procediires applicable to the
actdition, the Board considered the advisory
Records, sitting in executive
In
5730 Ser N 12
l/320 of 12 April 2002, a
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a
when applying for a correction of an
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
presunlption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
upon submission of new and material
In this regard, it is important
ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
COMMANDER NAVAL RESERVE FORCE
DAUPHINE STREET
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70146.5046
4400
IN REPLY REFER TO
5730
Ser
/iYi2
N121/
APR
J~,-,~
320
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
Commander,
Board for Correction of Naval Records
Naval Reserve Force
ADVISORY OPINIONS IN CASE OF
390-90-3796
(a) Your memo of 6 Sep 01
13/00
(b) ALNAVRESFOR
(1) Application for Correction of Military Record
(DD Form 149) of 14 Aug 01
1.
Recommending disapproval of enclosure (1).
Member does not meet all requirements for a Prior Service
2.
bonus.
current contract and has drilled within the past 180 days.
Member affiliated from the Individuals Ready Reserve on a
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00019-02
opinion furnished by NRF, letter, 5730 Ser attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nurse Corps officer may apply In 1998, she was assigned NOBCs 19766 (Family Nurse Practitioner with Master's level No other specialties have been assigned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05914-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by COMNAVRESFOR memorandum ‘5730 Ser 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03147-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV N AVY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 07398-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You reenlisted on 22 April 1999, after the date establishing the Selected Reserve Bonus Program.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04208-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5730 PERS 9 13C 1 of 20 July 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04209-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05362-02
Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting session, considered your application oil were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00209-01
A three-member pane1 of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. We do not support Petty Officer nd that his record not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08767-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP : ddj Docket No: 8767-02 14 January 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3281 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has been denied. presumption of Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.