Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05914-02
Original file (05914-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP : ddj
Docket No: 5914-02
26 November 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 26 November 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by COMNAVRESFOR memorandum  ‘5730 Ser  
2002, a copy of which is attached.

Your allegations of error and

Nl12/1435 of 17 October

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of  your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

NAVY
DEPARTMENT OF THE 
COMMANDER NAVAL RESERVE FORCES COMMAND
DAUPHINE STREET

4400 

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70146-5100

IN REPLY REFER   TO:

573 0
Ser 

N112/
OCT  1 7 2002

1435

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Commander, Naval Reserve Forces Command
Board 

foq Correction of Naval Records

ADVISORY OPINIONS IN THE CASE OF

(a) Your memo of 20 Sep  02
(b) ALNAVRESFOR 

13/00

(1) Application for Correction of Military Record

(DD Form 149) of 26 Jun  02

1
i  .

Recommending disapproval of enclosure (1).

;ju?_horized for his rate and pay

reenlisted an incentive bonus was not

P

3 ’



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06880-02

    Original file (06880-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07826-02

    Original file (07826-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive ap,lication on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6207 of 13 November 2002, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08767-02

    Original file (08767-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP : ddj Docket No: 8767-02 14 January 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06882-02

    Original file (06882-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32 copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08601-02

    Original file (08601-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. (N132) and SNM was Paygrade earned while in the Per enclosure (1) paygrade (b), This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01454-00

    Original file (01454-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by COMNAVRESFOR memorandum ‘5420 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08590-02

    Original file (08590-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (c), sailor may reenlist anytime within the same fiscal year The petitioner's EAOS is 17 May 2003, which is in the Per In view of the above, recommend the petitioner record remain as 2. is. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01333-02

    Original file (01333-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07000-02

    Original file (07000-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 2002. that would allow payment of an $8,000 He shipped to Recruit T In his petition, Seaman 2001, and signed contract for a volunteered for the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06545-02

    Original file (06545-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition., the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.