DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
Docket No: 4208-01
14 August 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in
session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5730 PERS 9 13C 1 of 20 July 2001, a copy of
which is attached.
executive
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
N AVY
PE R SO N N EL COMMAN
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
Y
D
5730
PERS-913Cl
20 Jul 01
MEMORANDUM
FC>R EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)
Ref:
(a) PERS OOCZB Memo of 25 Jun 01
Encl:
(1) BCNR File 4208-01
Per reference (a),
1.
following recommendation and comments:
enclosure (1) is forwarded with the
(a) Recommend that
to IT1 be disapproved.
request for reinstatement
(b)
was authorized a TAR Recall upon accepting
Our research
a reduction in rate from IT1 to IT2.
indicates that she was aware of the reduction in rate
requirement.
reenlisted and signed her Immediate Reenlistment
Contract,
indication of an error or injustice in this case.
On 6 March 2001 she voluntarily
NAVPERS 1070-601, as an IT2.
There is no
Additional questions may be directed to
2.
(901) 874-4508 or DSN 882-4508.
PN
at
By Direction
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03147-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV N AVY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01685-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 1685-01 20 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: IT 2 (AW) tigate, Us NF Regan REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Also, the power to set aside an executed )¢G5-0/ punishment should ordinarily be exercised only within a reasonable time after the punishment has been executed. The Commanding Officer, Helicopter...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06215-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Our letter, s not physically qualified and directed Naval not physically disk on 27 Jan 00, "inform member in writing of reference (d), stated Reference Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF b. In response to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04348-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. HYT action until 31 December 1999. serbice, SK2 years of separation pay even i If eligible for RTB, SK2 retired pay at age 60.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04169-01
They also considered your counsel's letters dated 25 June 2001 with enclosures, 25 July 2001 with enclosure, and 23 March 2002. For us to recommend relief, the petitioner has to show that either there is no rational support for the reporting senior's action or that the reporting senior acted for an illegal or improper purpose. In this case, the reporting senior makes it clear in references (b) and (c) and his endorsement to the member's statement his reason for submitting the reports as they did.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08129-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's request be This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02196-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 May 2000, and the memorandum for the record dated 14 February 2001, copies of which are attached. Former Reference (b) requires that promotion selection essage, as was promotion boards and The Per reference (c), a lieutenant who has at least...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00209-01
A three-member pane1 of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. We do not support Petty Officer nd that his record not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04472-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 481lE9/525, 17 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08414-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. recommend no change to the The petitioner and received the zone reenlisted on 09 August 1999 for four years "B" SRB maximum of $30K for the FC rate. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (1) is returned.