Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04332-01
Original file (04332-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 4332-01
25 September 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

1552.

 

25 September 2001. Your allegations of error and

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on  
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board.
Doculllentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 20 August 2001, a copy of
which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAW

NAVY  l  ERSOWMIL COMMAND
DRIVI

IWTS8RltY 

S7tO 

YlLLllOTOW  

TN 

380s 

5-0000

1160
PERS-815
20 Aug 01

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO

Ref:

SNM's  DD Form 149 dtd 22 May 01

(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
(c) NAVADMIN
(d) OPNAVINST  

132/99
049/01
1160.6A

..-

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval to the

a.

The petitioner signed a NAVPERS 

1070/621  extension on 25

August 1999 for 36 months to accept orders to AFSC NORFOLK, VA.
The petitioner also signed for   36 months  to execute an "SRB
qualifying" extension.
April 2001.

The petitioner's EAOS at the time was 29

b.

Reference (b) listed a zone "B" SRB entitlement for the
GSM rate with an award of 1.5 at the time the petitioner signed
the 36 months extension.

30 April
The petitioner's extension went operative on  
Reference (c) listed the zone "B" SRB entitlement for the

2OOlC.
GSM rate with an award of 2.0.
initial zone "B"
SRB payment effective the operative date of his
extension and received the SRB entitlement based on the 1.5 award
level.

The petitioner received his

The petitioner requests to have the award level

entitlement adjusted to reflect 2.0 vice  

1.5.

d.

e.

Per reference (d),

when an enlisted member extends

enlistment for three years or more the SRB is calculated by the
award level based on the extension agreement date and not the
operative extension date.
available concerning this matter.

There are currently no waivers

In view of the above,

2.
as is.

recommend the petitioner's record remain

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the

3.
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
is returned.

Enclosure (1)

eenlistment

Incentives Branch

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04291-00

    Original file (04291-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2000. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAW l IRSOWWLL COMMAND DRIVE IlTlDRltY 5720 YlLLlNDTOlT11 2805 5-0000 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO 116 0 PERS-815 29 Aug 00 Ref: SNM's DD Form 149 dtd...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00641-01

    Original file (00641-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 1 May 2001, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01519-01

    Original file (01519-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03422-99

    Original file (03422-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160 is attached. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenlistment date of 07 Dec 96 and effect a 7 month extension to his P3D of July 1997.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01407-01

    Original file (01407-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01302-01

    Original file (01302-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the reenlistment date of 02 July 1999 and effect a reenlistment upon the completion date of MA ā€œAā€ school training and receive the zone ā€œCā€ SRB entitlement in reference (c). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02695-01

    Original file (02695-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. bv the Board for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02164-01

    Original file (02164-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 PERS-815 dated 11 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. The petitioner requests to change the reenlistment date of 23 February 2001 to reflect 02 April 2001 and receive the zone B" SRB entitlement in reference (c).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02284-01

    Original file (02284-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY 5750 YlLLlllDTOW ,LRSOWWEL COMMAND IWTEQRITY DRIVE TN 38055-0000 1160 PERS-815 11 Jun 01 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Subj: Ref: PERS-OOZCB BCNR PETITION ICO SNM's DD...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04438-01

    Original file (04438-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Per reference (b), members not SRB eligible who agree to obliserve to train and reenlist for service in a rating or NEC that at the time of the agreement is designated for award of SRB Once the member had may be paid the bonus for that specialty. "B" SRB entitlement for the the time the petitioner attended the training. The petitioner request to adjust the zone "C" SRB d. "B" and receive the higher SRB entitlement to reflect zone entitlement.