DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
WMP
Docket No:
19 August 2002
2586-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session,
application on 14 August 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
Your allegations of error and
considered your
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 29 August 2000
for four years at age 17.
a psychiatric evaluation and were diagnosed with unspecified
personality disorder with borderline features.
The clinical
psychologist recommended expeditious administrative separation
because he believed that you posed a serious threat to yourself
and/or others.
On 8 March 2001 you were referred for
On 13 March 2001 you were notified that separation action was
being initiated due to the diagnosed personality disorder.
were advised of and waived all of your procedural rights.
the separation authority directed separation, you received an
general discharge
2001, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
byyeason of personality disorder on 30 March
You
After
Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 or RE-3G
reenlistment code to an individual separated by reason of
Due to the severity of your personality
personality disorder.
disorder and the danger that you posed to yourself and/or others
if retained,
the Board concluded that the RE-4 reenlistment code
was properly assigned and no change is warranted.
The Board did not consider the characterization of your
discharge since you did not request recharacterization, and you
have not exhausted your administrative remedies by first
(NDRB).
petitioning to the Naval Discharge Review Board
authorized to change both the reason for discharge and the
characterization of discharge.
reenlistment code.
to apply to NDRB.
Enclosed is a DD Form 293, which you may use
However, it cannot change a
NDRB is
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
it is important to keep in mind that
You are entitled to have
In this regard,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02644-03
approved your separation and on 19 December 2001, you were discharged with an entry-level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to the diagnosed depressive and personality disorders. depressive and personality disorders, would have posed a threat to yourself and others, the Board Given the severity of the diagnosed and since your retention concluded that the RE-4 reenlistment code was properly and Accordingly, your request has been appropriately assigned. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03919-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 1 November 2000. Subsequently, on 4 October 2001...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07992-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2003. As a result of this hospitalization, a psychological evaluation diagnosed you as having a borderline personality disorder with narcissistic features and alcohol dependence. It was recommended that you receive alcohol rehabilitation treatment and that you be administratively separated due to your diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07314-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You enlisted in the Navy on 3 August 1994 for four years at age 18.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03870-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 30 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01880-01
opinion furnished by the Specialty Advisory to the Surgeon General for Psychiatry, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support Your allegations of error and a copy of which is attached. * The Board found that on 10 November 1994 you enlisted in the Navy 'The record reflects that on 27 February 1995, while at age 18. under...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00751-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Given the existence of such a disorder, and since retention would have posed a threat to yourself and others, the Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09632-02
A three-member panel o$ the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. Although the documents concerning your separation processing are not contained in your records, it is clear that you were processed for separation by reason of fraudulent entry due to your failure to disclose pre-service medical treatment and diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07493-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The medical record shows that you However, there is no Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated based on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00601-03
If your le A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2003. approved your separation and on that same day, you were discharged with an entry-level separation by reason of e enlistment due to the diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.