DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
WMP
Docket No:
5 September 2002
3502-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
materi'al considered by the Board consisted
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
Your allegations of error and
Documentary
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
On 9 February 2000 you were
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 11 August 1999
for four years at age 18.
The senior medical
hospitalized in order to prevent self-harm.
officer noted that you had recently used marijuana in an attempt
to be discharged.
personality disorder and an adjustment disorder and recommended
expeditious administrative separation because of your
longstanding pattern of maladaptive character traits that
severely impaired your ability to function in the naval
environment.
He diagnosed you with a passive-aggressive
On 6 March 2000 you were notified that separation action was
being initiated due to the diagnosed personality disorder.
were advised of and-waived all of your procedural rights, with
the exception of obtaining copies of documents that support the
You
basis for separation.
discharge by reason of personality disorder, and were assigned
an RE-4 reenlistment code.
On 10 March 2000, you received an general
Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 or RE-3G
reenlistment code to an individual separated by reason of
personality disorder.
and adjustment disorders,
reenlistment code was properly assigned and no change is
warranted.
the Board concluded that the RE-4
Due to the severity of your personality
The Board did not consider the characterization of your
discharge since you did not request recharacterization, and you
have not exhausted your administrative remedies by first
applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
authorized to change both the reason for discharge and the
characterization of discharge.
reenlistment code.
to apply to NDRB.
Enclosed is a DD Form 293, which you may use
However, it cannot change a
NDRB is
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
You are entitled to have
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure:
DD Form 293
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02586-02
the separation authority directed separation, you received an general discharge 2001, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. byyeason of personality disorder on 30 March You After Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 or RE-3G reenlistment code to an individual separated by reason of Due to the severity of your personality personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07326-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 14 May 1997, you enlisted in the Navy at age 20. On 30 November 2000, you received a psychiatric...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07992-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2003. As a result of this hospitalization, a psychological evaluation diagnosed you as having a borderline personality disorder with narcissistic features and alcohol dependence. It was recommended that you receive alcohol rehabilitation treatment and that you be administratively separated due to your diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09632-02
A three-member panel o$ the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. Although the documents concerning your separation processing are not contained in your records, it is clear that you were processed for separation by reason of fraudulent entry due to your failure to disclose pre-service medical treatment and diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03400-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 27 October 2004 at age 20. You were discharged the same day with a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02355-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03919-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 1 November 2000. Subsequently, on 4 October 2001...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01883-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07506-01
Your allegations of error and Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07890-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 31 July 2001 at age 18. on 27 August 2002 you received nonjudicial...