Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04989-02
Original file (04989-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

Y

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

TRG
Docket No:
18 September 

4989-02
2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record-and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You contend in your application that you were not released from
active duty on 6 April 1964 but continued to serve until May
1964.
request and have not stated why you want such a correction.

You have not provided any documentation to support your

The record shows that you enlisted in the Navy on 29 April 1960
and served until you were honorably released from active duty on
The 6 April 1964 date is shown on your DD Form
6 April 1964.
214, and entries on three other service record pages also show
that you were released from active duty on that date.
the DD Form 214 and one other record entry.
Form 214 and other service record pages are enclosed for your
information.

Copies of the DD

You signed

The Board was aware that regulations allow for separation up to
90 days prior to the expiration of an enlistment in certain
situations.
separated on 6 April 1964,
the date of your release from active duty was not warranted.

Since the record clearly shows that you were

the Board concluded that a change in

Accordingly, your application has been denied.

The names and

votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

2

AUTHENTICATION

VA DATA

SERVICE DATA

SELECTIVE
SERVICE

TRANSFER OR

DISCHARGE DATA

xx

x

: x
:w x x x

DATE 

TK,,NSfFPRED

NO 

MO5 

S 

FSD THIS COMMAND

; 
I

I

ACTlYlii TO WHICH TRANSFERRED

’
 

REPORTED AT

/ 
 

i,,,,,,.,, 

r:r 

“,isr,,iiii 
I

DATE REPORTED

SIGNATURE AND RANK

’

SERVICE NO

BRANCH AND CLASS

DATE TRANSFERRED

NO MOS  

S,‘FSD 

THIS COMMAND

ACTIVITY  TO WHICH TRANSFERRED

I

RATE

~_
AUTH

PVRPOSE OF TRANSFER

/Ini, 
 

/~ir/rii,l,or~ 

fit ,

_____~

SIGNATURE AND RANK

’

FOR USE OF INTERMEDIATE REPORTING STATIONS

(I/ 
 

nc

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05805-02

    Original file (05805-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL RECORDS 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 5805-02 24 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. This information becomes a part of the subject's military personnel records which are used to docurnent prwnotion. SO- , do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and against of e: and that 1 will obey...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01483-01

    Original file (01483-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    period from 20 December 1958 to 28 January 1965 you were a member of the Marine Corps Reserve and earned about four years and six months of qualifying service for reserve retirement. Therefore, the Board substantially T.he Board also considered whether your record could or should be corrected to show that you are eligible for reserve retirement and retired pay at age 60. retirement, an individual must have 20 years of qualifying service and the last eight years must be in the reserve...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00376

    Original file (FD2005-00376.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    R 111111111111111111 1 -.-- S1G -- --------- 2 ---- ~ TI1 F OF BOAItD Y IDENT 2 ~ 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z ' L ~ ~ ~ ~ I"' I 1 SANMKDR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 hL'CItETAR1' O F T H E AIR FORCE PERSOh3El C'Ollh('lL .AIR FOR('E DISCHAICGE HL'VIE\V BO4RD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD PI.OOR ANDREWS AFR, MU 20761-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used d AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISlONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00376 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00017

    Original file (FD2006-00017.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Information was extracted from the Legal Review) LOR, LOR, LOC, 21 JAN 04 - 08 SEP 03 - 22 FEB 02 - LOR, LOR, LOR, LOC, LOC, 05 NOV 01 - 21 AUG 01 - 21 AUG 01 - 18 JUN 01 - 14 FEB 01 - Financial irresponsibility. On 5 Jan 04, an investigation revealed L11dAnn i ~&shunurabiy fdcd iv pay iis Military Star Card debt, for which he wj3 given a Lettor 6Fiiphand (LOR), dated 2 1 Jan 04, which was filed in his Personnel Information File (PIF). Direct that the respondent bo discharged from the Air...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00509

    Original file (FD2004-00509.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    -- - AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00509 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change the reason and authority for the discharge, and change the reenlistment code. Issue I: ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. < f ' v l i C f i ' f 5 b. I previously submitted an application on (Enterdate) and I am completing this form in order t o submit additional issues.

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2008-00336

    Original file (FD-2008-00336.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION ON (Enter date) AND AM COMPLETING THIS FORM IN ORDER TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL ISSUES. LOR, dated 25 Jul 05 4, AF Form 3070, dated 23 May 06 5.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02602-02

    Original file (02602-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2602-02 15 April 2002 This is in response to your Application for Correction of Military Records requesting that the a nonjudicial punishment be removed from your Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) record. The Board has no authority to correct FBI records. In your case, the Naval Criminal Investigative Service apparently fingerprinted you on about 2 February 1999 as a result of charges filed against you for an orders violation, making false official statement, and larceny of $9,800.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00456

    Original file (FD2005-00456.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST M1I)DLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COIINSEL AND OR ORGANlZATlON YES No I X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORCANlLATlON OF COllNSEL X X : -1 I I I EX&lf4lTs I~&MITTLD TI)+g@E BOARD ORDER APPOTNTTNG 'I I IE BOARD APPI.ICA? During his last term of service (3 years, 3 months, 4 days), the Arizona Air National Guard documented his character of service as general under honorable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02408-02

    Original file (02408-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2002. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00307

    Original file (FD2006-00307.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIKS'I' MIDDLE INI'I'IAL) CKADE AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a I TYPE GEN 1 Y E S C o L ~ S E ~ n 1 NAME O F COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION PERSONAL APPEARANCE AB I X RECORDREVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANI%A'l'ION O F C'CIIINSEI I 1 I MEMBER S I T T I N G I I HON I GEN VOTE OF THE BOARD I UOTHC I OTHER I DENY 1NL)ES NUMBER A66.00 1 CASENUMBER EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 1 I ORDER...