DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JLP:yr.j
Docket No: 2692-02
9 July 2002
pawI of the
Board for Correction
A three-member
session, considered your application on 9 July
adniinist
were reviewed in accordance
Roartl. Documentary
proceedings of
application,
applicable
opinion furnished
attached.
together with
statlltes,
I1ic’I1ior;~li(l~1lii
regulaticjnc
by
Nl’(:
mterial submitted
lmlicic\.
1780
tli wi
all
and
this
of Naval Records, sitting in executive
2002.
Your allegations of error and injustice
regillations and procedures applicable to the
consitlerc~d by the Board consisted of your
5upport thereof, your naval record and
rative
material
in
In addition.
I’EKS-604
tlic
Board considered the advisory
of‘ 24 May 2002, a copy of which is
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished
t~pcm request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of
your case
Board reconsider its
You are entitled to have the
evidence or other matter not previously considered
to keep in mind that a
when applying for a correction of an official
demonstrate
the existence of probable material error
presun~ption of regularity attaches to all
or injustice.
that favorable action cannot be taken.
such
are
tlccision
s~lbiiiission of new and material
iilmi
by the Board.
In this regard, it is important
ofticial records. Consequently,
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
N A VY PERSONNEL
C OMM AN D
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN
38055-0000
Y
178 0
PERS-604
24 May 02
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)
(a) CNPC memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 16 May 02
(b) Title 38,
(c) Veterans Benefits and Health Care Improvement Act of
United States Code, Chapter 32
2000 (PL 106-419)
1.
The following is provided in response to reference (a):
a.
Recommend the Board deny
in the Veterans Educational Assi
reference (b),
30 June 1985,
to 31 March 1987.
deadlines lost their eligibility.
VEAP was closed to new enrollments on
but reopened for five months from 28 October 1986
Members who did not enroll before these
request to enroll
( VEA P). Per
b.
There are almost 40,000 Sailors on active duty who are
Reference (c) provided an opportunity for
in this category.
those who participated in VEAP to enroll in the Montgomery GI
s law contained no
Bill (MGIB) Program.
to enroll in the MGIB
provisions for members like
Program.
Unfort
PERS-604 point of contact is Ms.
2.
reached at (DSN) 882-4260 or
(C)
901-874-4260.
who can be
hucation Programs
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08083-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 J LP: yrj Docket No: X083-0 9 July 2002 1 panel A three-member session, considered your were reviewed in proceedings of‘ this Board. application, together with all applicable statutes. regulations opinion furnished NI’C attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07937-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandu~n 1780 Pers 604 of l l January 2002, a copy of which is attached. c. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06603-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opening a VEAP account prior to the legislated deadlines, he is not eligible for VEAP benefits or conversion to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02220-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. At the time of ; entry onto active duty in 1980, it would have been impossible for him to have been counseled an education assistance program that didn't exist until 1985. no one could have enrollment period, requirements of the VEAP to Montgomery GI Bill conversion opportunities that didn't...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01087-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 DDJ:d_j Docket No: 1087-02 19 April 2002 Reference is made to your Application for Correction of‘ Naval Record (DD Form 149). (b), VEAP was closed to new enrollments on but reopened for five months from 28 October 1986 Members who did not enroll before these Assistake Program request to enroll (VEAP). Per b. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01712-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Eligibility for federal education benefit programs is determined by the member's initial entrance onto active duty other than for training. without enrollment in the MGIB Program, would have no education benefits.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07306-01
A three-niember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP. Members who initially entered active duty during the VEAP era were not eligible for MGIB Program enrollment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06757-01
Documentary material consitleretl by the Boartl consisted of your application, together with all ~ilaterial suh~nittctl in support thereat', your niiviil record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Boartl considered the advisory I3 Noveliilw 2001. a copy of After careful and conscientioirs consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probahle material error or In this connection,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04264-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The following is provided in response to reference (a): Recommend the Board deny Veterans Educational Assistance Program Per (b),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05959-01
It was closed to new enrollments on 30 June 1985, Members who did not enroll before these deadlines Program (VEAP). references (c) and participate in VEAP. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to In some cases, members enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP.