Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02090-02
Original file (02090-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD  FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

ā€˜2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 2090-02
17 September 2002

iā€

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

  naval record pursuant to the

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 17 September 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser
copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice were

334/6085 of 11 May 2002, a

 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a  
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

presmnption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
on the applicant to

  such that favorable action cannot be taken.

  In this regard, it is important

 

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE

5722 INTEGRITY DR.
 
38054-5057

Commander,
Executive Director

Navy  Recruiting Comman

d

, Board for Correction of Naval

From:
To:

Subj 

:

Ref:

(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST  

1130.8F

Encl:

(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 02090-02

IN REPLY REFER TO

:

1133
Ser 

334/ 

Los5

  Records

 

Per reference (a),
OSVET's to enlist as E-5 and above,

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

1.
ECM approval is required for
and they must enter into a rating where their skills or training
are directly convertible to a Navy rating. If skills are
determined not to be convertible,
paygrade  E-5 and above will be enlisted as E-3, with a guarantee
of E-4 after successful completion of A school.
an E-4 as in this case,
below that of which discharged,
The applicant was enlisted into a Navy rating that he did not
have convertible skills or training.
only entitled to  
paygrade  E-3 with
school.

OSVETS will be enlisted one

only OSVETS discharged in

but not lower than  

IAW current policy, he was

E-4 upon completion of "A"

If discharged as

paygrade

 
paygrade E-3.

This is an advisory memorandum

2.
Correction of Naval Records only.

for use by the Board for
Enclosure (1) is returned.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01416-01

    Original file (01416-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NRC letter 1133 Ser attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01092-01

    Original file (01092-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC letter 1133 Ser attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02406-01

    Original file (02406-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04034-01

    Original file (04034-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 1 July 2001. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07268-01

    Original file (07268-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03469-01

    Original file (03469-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER In addition, the Board considered the advisory of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02861-01

    Original file (02861-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04429-01

    Original file (04429-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01689-01

    Original file (01689-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC letter 1133 Ser attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06586-02

    Original file (06586-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition., the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...