DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No:
9 May 2002
194-02
This is in
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
.reference to your application for correction of your
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 May 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
and reported to active duty on the
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 29
April 1980 at age 19,
following day.
nonjudicial punishments for a brief unauthorized absence,
larceny, possession of marijuana,
place of duty and failure to obey a lawful order.
on 5 March 1982 you received a general discharge by reason of
burden to command.
The record reflects that you received three
absence from your appointed
Subsequently,
Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and
overall traits averages,
assigned during periodic evaluations.
trait averages were 2.60 and 2.75, respectively.
marks of 3.0 in conduct and 2.8 in overall traits were required
for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of
your separation.
both of which are computed from marks
Your conduct and overall
Minimum average
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
and since your conduct
given your three nonjudicial punishments,
and overall traits averages were insufficiently high to warrant a
fully honorable discharge.
been denied.
will be furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the members of the panel
Accordingly, your application has
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02969-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. nonjudicial punishments were more than sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06242-01
conduct mark of 3.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. In this regard, no law or military regulation the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to your three nonjudicial punishments as well as the fact that your conduct average was insufficiently high to warrant a fully honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04190-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. conduct mark of 3.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01073-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08750-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found the evidence and materials submitted were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03794-02
the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient You enlisted in the Navy on 7 December 1973 at the age of 17. Your conduct average was 2.0. and the record contains no such evidence.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05636-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 April injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00046-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. As requested by reference (a), Mr. petition for award of the Vietnam Service Medal has been reviewed.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05067-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 June 1979. A minimum average conduct mark of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02635-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 29 December 1972, you enlisted in the Navy at age 19.