DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No:
3 September 2002
4190-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 28 August 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The record reflects that you received three
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 17 October 1972
at age 19.
nonjudicial punishments.
absence of two days, violation of a lawful general regulation,
On 23 June 1975 you were
and failure to obey a lawful order.
separated under honorable conditions and transferred to the Naval
Reserve.
You received a general discharge from the Naval Reserve
on 9 June 1978, upon completion of your military obligation.
The offenses included an unauthorized
Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and
overall traits averages,
assigned during periodic evaluations.
trait averages were 2.97 and 3.33, respectively.
conduct mark of 3.0 was required for a fully honorable
characterization of service at the time of separation.
both of which are computed from marks
Your conduct and overall
A minimum
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially
immaturity.
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
mitigatihg factors, such as your youth and
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
due to your three disciplinary actions, as well as the fact that
insufficiently high to warrant a fully
your conduct average was
honorable discharge.
denied.
furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
Accordingly, your application has been
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06662-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Minimum average marks of 3.0 in conduct and 2.8 in overall traits were required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of your separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00194-02
.reference to your application for correction of your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge and since your conduct given your three nonjudicial punishments, and overall traits averages were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07039-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. conducted on 22 January 1965, diagnosed you with a personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06242-01
conduct mark of 3.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. In this regard, no law or military regulation the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to your three nonjudicial punishments as well as the fact that your conduct average was insufficiently high to warrant a fully honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02969-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. nonjudicial punishments were more than sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05567-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04718-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this materi'al considered by the Board consisted Board. of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The On 31 May 1966 The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01073-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02635-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 29 December 1972, you enlisted in the Navy at age 19.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05467-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. conduct mark of 3.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...