Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06336-03
Original file (06336-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF

 

THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No: 6336-03
11 September 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
Your allegations of error and
application on 10 September 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 18 July
2003, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did
not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your
administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review
Board (NDRB).
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached
DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

In this connection, the Board substantially

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Executive Dir

Enclosures

2

DEPART

M ENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

3250 RUSSELL ROA

D

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-510

3

.

’

IN REPLY REFER TO:
1040
MMER/RE
1 
JUL 

8 2003

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

Encl:

ER PRIVATE FIRST CLASS
SUBJ: RECODE

118(11)  Of 2 
118(12)  Of 9 

(1) NAVMC 
(2) NAVMC 
(3) Copy of Naval Hospital Cherry Point 
(4)

s DD Form 149 of 8 Jun 03

Dee  99
Dee  99

ltr  of 1 

Dee 99

.

1
been
assigned.
The reenlistment code was assigned based on his
overall record and means that he did not meet the physical/
medical standards for reenlistment at the time of separation.

service record has been reviewed and it has
at

his reenlistment code of RE-3P was correctly

on February 1,

2.
was discharged Under Honorable Conditions
(General)
2000 by reason of Personality Disorder.
A review of the administrative portion of his service record
indicates that he was counseled concerning spouse abuse, and not
being recommended for reenlistment.
the record shows that he received one nonjudicial punishment
under the Uniform Code of Military Justice for offenses which
included violating a general order, transporting a loaded,
concealed handgun in his privately owned vehicle, and assaulting
his wife.
personality disorder which rendered him unsuitable for continued
military service.

It is also noted that he was diagnosed with a severe

The disciplinary portion of

Enclosures 

(1) through 

(3) pertain.

After  a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters

3 .
concurs in the professional evaluation of Mr.
cations for reenlistment at the time of separation.
is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or upgraded as
a result of events that occur after separation or based merely
on the passage of time.

qualifi-
Once a code

The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an

4.
administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability
for reenlistment at the time of separation from the Marine Corps.
The code may, however,
acquiring branch of service per their own policies and
regulations.

be waived at the discretion of the

5.

Enclosure (4) is returned for final action.

uation

Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06460-03

    Original file (06460-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps undated, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05209-06

    Original file (05209-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Branch, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08064-06

    Original file (08064-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 31 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05747-03

    Original file (05747-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 5747-03 20 August 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00630-06

    Original file (00630-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06164-06

    Original file (06164-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 10 July 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00587-07

    Original file (00587-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRSDocket No: 587-0720 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2007. The Board also considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01705-07

    Original file (01705-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5 100TJRDocket No: 1705-07 5 September 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2007. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09905-06

    Original file (09905-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 June 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 05251-04

    Original file (05251-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 17 June 2004, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficienttheestablish the...