DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BJG
Docket No: 4639-99
7 November 2001
CRET
Dear Serg
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 7 November 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 16 June 2000
with enclosure, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
.
.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROA
D
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
22 134-5 103
,N
REPLY
REFER TO:
1400/3
MMPR-2
16 Jun 00
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
.
Subj:
Encl:
1
M
ER
(1) copy of co,
of 20 Jan 53
3dBn, 7thMar
ltr
CEJ/lww
P17-2 Ser: 24
1.
mil
the
at the time of his injury in action while serving on active duty
in Korea but was not awarded a promotion.
retired Marine sergeant, requests that his
ecords show that he was awarded promotion to
nk.
He states that he was pending a promotion
2.
After review
found that he was
sergeant, however,
romotion not be effected for reasons indicated in the enclosure.
nding Officer requested that his
tion to the grade of staff
rvice record book, it was
s placed on the temporary disability retired list on
and subsequently transferred to the Permanent
1 May 1953
Disability Retired List on 1
May 1957 at the highest rank he
Promotion Branch
By direction of
the Commandant of the Marine Corps
Co.Tmxxidi_xg Officer
Conxta,ndant of the
(1) Commanding
(2j Commanding
(3)
CoKaaanding
$&rine
Gflicer,
&neral,
General,
Corps (Code DE)
7th
1st
Fleet
l:Aarines
I&+;e Division
&arine Force;
(Reinf),
Pacific
.?YF;
Frofii:
10:"1
Via:
S&j:
iief:
(a}
jbj
Para 9361.2,
i~:cso
3,i++52
L-c>,
1.
to the
Reference
(bj authorized
ra:& of staff sergeant.
Sergea
of
t;he
p~OiilOtiOi? of
5ergean
in
the
2.
of
reported, that in
for
prorlotion at this
corlpiiailce with reference (a;?,
$La&e
wh
iry opinion Serge
‘oe notified
Cores
tixe.
xhich directs that the
Conznandant
effected, it is
20t
considered
quslified
3.
The reasons for not effecting this
promotion are as follows:
a.
Serg
reasoning ab
field.
b
.
Serg
comissioned
AC
4.
Sergea
led to demonstrate the necessary force and
z
n'oncom&sioned officer in his
\
occu+tional
he initiative required of a staff
non-
irrther considered that to
time
rvokl_d be a
ef?ect the promotion of
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08381-00
The petitioner has offered absolutely no documentary that he missed only six hours of class Finally, while paragraph nine of enclosure (5) to evidence whatsoever to prove his allegations that his absences were due to medical reasons or that the report itself contains "false statements" (i.e., vice 60). The counseling entry meets the elements of a proper page 11 counseling in that it lists specific deficiencies and recommendations for corrective found, and states that Sergeant to make a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02912-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2003. d injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures appli ble to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 9 July 2002, a copy of attached. Documentary material considered by the In addition, the Board considered Your allegations of error Board rd and 1 founb that the After...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03973-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lg (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 12 July 1999. (5), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page llg (“Adarministrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03738-02
petitioner's assignment to the Military Appearance Program was correctly included on the fitness reports. As with Report A, the adversity of Report B was that he was assigned to the Military Appearance Program. rmance Evaluation Review Board Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROA D QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-510 3 MEMORANDUM FOR...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03138-01
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed amendment of the contested fitness report to reflect you were the subject of a meritorious mast. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 18 April 2001, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06813-02
Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY SERGEANT E CASE OF STAFF MC 5. MC0 P5354.1C, Marine MC0 1610.12, the U.S. 3 . The counseling entry meets the elements of a proper page 11 counseling in that it lists deficiencies, recommendations for corrective action, and states that Staff opportunity to make a rebutta Additionally, the entry affords him an opportunity to annotate whether or not he desires to make such a statement and if made, a copy of the statement...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03119-01
1 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: SE OF STAFF SERGEAN Staff Sergeant 1. has been reviewed concerning his request for removal of the Administrative Remarks (1070) NAVMC 000714 and CMC letter of selection from the 2000 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board, from his service records. 118(11) page 11 entry dated 1450/5 MMPR-2 dated 22 Aug 2000, revocation application with supporting documents MC0 authorizes commanders to make entries on page...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08720-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing a service record page 11 ( “Administrative Remarks (1070)“) entry dated 31 July 1992. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070) “) counseling entry dated 31 July 1992. corrective action by this Headquarters...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05129-02
JEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANT ICO, V IRGINIA 221 34-51 0 3 : IN REPLY REFER TO 1610 MMER/PERB MAY ltitil 0 3 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APP SERGEAN E CASE OF STAFF USMC (a) (b) SSgt MC0 P1610.7D s DD Form 149 of 15 Jan 02 w/Ch 1-4 Per MC0 1610.11C, 1. with three members...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08387-01
Petitioner denied that the applicant Petitioner was offered, and he accepted, NJP. Analysis a. Petitioner claims that his NJP was unjust because he believes the preliminary inquiry into his misconduct contained "inconsistencies" a statement Petitioner made at the NJP. The record of the NJP reveals that the NJP was just.