Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00825-03
Original file (00825-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY 

BOARD  F O R C O R R E C T I O N   O F   NAVAL  R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   20370-5100 

LCC:ddj 
Docket No:  825-03 
15 April 2003 

This is in  reference to your  application for correction of  your  naval  record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A  three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive session, 
considered  your  application on  15 April 2003.  Your  allegations of  error and  injustice were 
reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board consisted of  your 
application, together with  all material submitted in  support thereof, your  naval record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.  In  addition, the Board considered the advisory 
opinion  furnished by  CMC  memorandum  1070 CMT of  21 March 2003, a copy of  which is 
attached. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record,  the Board  found  that the 
evidence submitted  was insufficient to establish  the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your application has I w n  denied.  The ~ l a ~ ~ i e s  
and votes of 
the members of  the panel  will  be  furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of  your  case are such that  favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled  to have the Board  reconsider its decision  upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter not  previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record,  the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 

3 2 8 0  RUSSELL ROAD 

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA  22134-5103 

IN REPLY REFER TO: 

1070 
CMT 
21 Mar 03 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Subj :  RESERVE 
CASE OF 

Ref: 

(a) 

-  . *,> 

Supporting Documentation 

DD Form 149 dtd 12 JAN 03 with 

1. This office has reviewed the material provided in reference 
(a) to determine whether or not- 
should have his 
time in service and time in grade reinstated.  We have reviewed 
the su porting documentation and these are the findings: 
dIm!mb obtained a full discharge in June of 1997.  However, 
the letter from the FBI academy is not dated until February of 
1999.  The questionnaire clearly states:"resign or be eligible 
to transfer to standby reserve status." 

, .- - 

sed on the stated findings we see no need to reinstate*- 

"k time in service/grade.  Time in grade and service is 

you have been out in excess of 3 years.  Had 
stayed in the reserves at least until he went to 

he would not have lost all of his time in grade 

and part of his time in service. 

3.  Our point of contact is Master Sergeant m
784-0519. 

a

t

 (703) 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02101-03

    Original file (02101-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2003. Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness reports: Date of Report Reporting Senior Period of Report 13 Jul 88 9 Jan 89 Capt Capt P 880414 to 880704 (DC) 880705 to 881231 (SA) 2. The Commandant of the Marine Corps is not empowered to grant or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07507-01

    Original file (07507-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. Docunwntary ~naterial considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all tilaterial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. VIRGINIA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1500 CMT 12 Feb 02 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS IN THE CASE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06669-03

    Original file (06669-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2003. Sincerely, Executive Directo Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VlROlNlA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1600 CMT 8 Sep 03 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: RESERVE AFFAIRS ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION: CASE OF COLONEL USMCR 1. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09361-02

    Original file (09361-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1070 CMT of 24 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05978-03

    Original file (05978-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 19 August 2003, a copy of which is attached. The BOI also substantiated misconduct or moral or professional dereliction as evidenced by the commission of military or civilian offenses, which, if prosecuted under the UCMJ, could be punished by six months or more, or would require proof of specific intent for conviction. The BOI recommended Petitioner's retention.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05947-03

    Original file (05947-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, ' when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. No correction to his Marine Corps record is reauired.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00213-03

    Original file (00213-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 0213-03 The reference requests an a petition to correct show that he was enrolled in the Reserve Component survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) when he died on 3 June 2000. record to 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06290-02

    Original file (06290-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of a n official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This action was taken following additional minor offenses against the UCMJ committed by Petitioner.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05733-03

    Original file (05733-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    We defer to BCNR on the issue of Lieutenant Colonel request for the removal of her failure of selection to the grade of Lieutenant Colonel. we furnished her with a copy of the Advisory Opinion Head, performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY I i E A O Q U A R T E R S U N I T E D S T A T E S M A R I N E C O R P S 3280 R U S S E L L R O A D Q U A N T I C O . Per the reference, we reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02269-03

    Original file (02269-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    V I R G I N I A 2 2 134-5 f 0 3 1N R E P L Y REFER TO: 1610 MMER/ PERB SEP 1 6 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLIC SERGEANT -, U h N IN THE CASE OF S M C Ref : (a) S (b) MCO P1610.7E w/Ch 1-4 t . Evaluation Review Board Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps DEPARTMENT OF...