DEPARTMENT OF
TH&’ NAVY
BOARD FOR
CORRECf&U OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BJG
Docket No: 6528-00
13 July 2001
DearW
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested promotion to
chief warrant officer-2 as of 22 June 1951.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In light of your inactive status from 1 May 1946 to 7 February 1958, they were
unable to find that you should have been promoted. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
&e&ion of an official naval record, the
J
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00427-01
df an official naval record, the burden is on the Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y NAVY Ml,LLlNGTON TN PERSONNEL.~OMMAND 38OSSOOOO 5720 INTEGRITY brilVE 5420 PERS-85 18 Apr 01 . ?WDUM FOR BCNR Via: Subj: Ref: BUPERS/BCNR Coordinator USNR , (a) USC (b) USC 10 Sec. Lieutenanptoonce placed on the promoted to Lieutenant with'a date of rank of 16 Apr 01 in accorddnce with ref the member is entitled to the grade of TDRL.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07753-01
You requested removal of your failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board and “promotion reconsideration:” Your additional request to remove the reviewing officer ’s certification from your fitness report for 31 December 1998 to 31 July 1999 was not considered, as your previous request to remove the entire report, docket number 5441-01, was considered and denied on 30 August 2001, and you have offered no new and material supporting evidence or other...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03509-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. name was on the list for promotion co Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05120-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 August 2001. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review (PERB), dated 25 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01358-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board concluded that you were properly discharged in the grade of corporal and there is no basis to change your military specialty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04718-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. IN REPLY REFER TO: 1400/3 MMPR-2 13 Mar 01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF FORMER - ‘ a retired Marine indicates that he completed his he grade of probationary corporal and should have been promoted to the grade of sergeant prior to his retirement from the Marine Corps on 22...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05563-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. During the period 16 March 1996 to 13 May 1998, you You reenlisted in the Navy on 13 April 1990 for five years and subsequently extended that enlistment on three occasions totaling 39 months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08579-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 16 February 2001, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04224-00
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400 G is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. For your information on the successive promotion quarters of July and October your IRR competitive score was still lower than the Marines who were promoted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05153-01
You requested, in effect, that the date of rank and effective date of your promotion to lieutenant be adjusted from 1 October, 2001 to 28 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...