DEPARTMENT OF
TW NAVY
BOARD FOR
CORRECTI+% OF NAVAL
RECO-RDS
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
HD:hd
Docket No: 0857940
12 July 2001
SNR RET
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 16 February 2001, a copy of which
is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
bf an official naval record, the burden is on the
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
COMM’AND
3805S-0000
NAVY PERSONNEL
MILLINGTON TN
INTEGRldY DRIVE
5720
MEMORANDUM FOR
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
I
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)
REQUEST
LIEUTEN
END
SNR
(a) BCNR memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 23 JAN 01
(b) SECNAVINST
1401.1B
Encl:
(1) BCNR File 08579-00 w/Service Record
5420
PERS-86
16
f %B
8x11
Per reference (a) enclosure (1) is returned recommending
eq-uest to have his second
1 .
disapproval of Lieutena
failure of se
The promotion zone and percentage
s properly considered during the FY-00
nt Commander Staff Corps Promotion
etary of the Navy directed the FY-01
ent with established law and policy.
claim is that he was at a disadvantage in
is peers due to an earlier convening date than the
merit..'His record before the
2.
Lieutenan
and FY-01 Res
Selection Boa
board to convened in June FY-00.
to select
Lieutenan
relation to
previous year's board is without
01 board woul
Ott 19
due 31
board. Lieute
his peers whe
training oppo
best and fully qualified for promotion based on the records of
those officers eligible at the date the board convened.
the annual lieutenant fitness report
performance record from the FY-00
as subject to the same constraints as
raining qualifications and annual
e board selected those officers who were
FY-
Lieutenan
3.
The negative
honorable service to this nation
be justifiably proud of his record.
s petition does not detract from his
Promotions, Appointments, and
Enlisted Advancement Division
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05662-00
The Board found that even if you had been considered by the Mobilization Disposition Board, and you had been - Inactive status as a result of approval of a board occurred until after the Fiscal Year (FY) 00 Naval Reserve Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Board had adjourned. recommendation again th is requesting removal 0 promotion to lieutenant original opinion stating that he transferred to Standby 19 May 1999 Naval Reserve Officer Mobilization Disposition Board. tha would have been a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08156-00
sine Chapter 15 contains the responsibilities “Each officer is responsible for ensuring Paragraph 15-5 states; “A ll officers should periodically review their official If eligible for consideration by a selection board, this review should be co months prior to the convening date to allow time for correction of discrepancies. Per reference (a), enclosure at former s requesting to have his honorable discharge (1) is returned with the petition be denied. time of his honorable discharge A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02507-01
You requested, in effect, removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 99 and 00 Naval Reserve Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Boards; that you be granted a special selection board for FY 99; that your discharge of 31 March 2000 from the Naval Reserve be set aside; that you be reinstated to the Inactive Status List lieutenant, with a date of rank adjustment to reflect seniority as if you had been placed on the ISL on 1 June 1998; and that your 16 June 1995 completion of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00445-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03343-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by changing the date of acceptance of his commission as a lieutenant, U. S. Naval Reserve from 22 December 1998 to 2 February 1998, the day after he left active duty; and that his lieutenant date of rank be changed accordingly from 2 February 1997 to 1 June 1996 (the date of rank he originally...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02196-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 May 2000, and the memorandum for the record dated 14 February 2001, copies of which are attached. Former Reference (b) requires that promotion selection essage, as was promotion boards and The Per reference (c), a lieutenant who has at least...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01679-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2002. The Board was likewise unable to find that the Commander, Naval Surface Reserve Force denied your right to an interview with him; that he inadequately reviewed the DFC documentation; or that he wrongfully concurred with and forwarded the DFC recommendation. Since the Board found that the DFC and related fitness report should stand, they had no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08509-00
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Shy and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 April 2001, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. They say the only action required of Petitioner to return to active duty or the Ready Reserve, if this correction is approved, is to request a Naval Reserve commission and submit a Ready Reserve service agreement to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Jan 31 11_19_45 CST 2001
i DSN Copy to: 21, 40) By direction o 703 614 9857.~2/ 2 .,~ 1920 PERS-911 ~7 JUN )999 SENT BY : IJSAED-CELMS-ED 7- 7-93 ;10:45AM COftS OF ENGINEERS— DEPARTMENT OF TH1 NAVY NAVY PISIONNIL COMMAND 17*0 ENTIOIITY DRIVI MILUNCTON TN 31055-0000 Comrnanc Personnel C From: To: Via: Subj: YOUR STATUS IN THE NAVAL RESERVE Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 1920.6A (b) COMNAVRESFORINST 1740.1 Per reference (a), an officer in the permanent grade of 1. lieutenant who has twice failed of selection for promotion to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07117-00
Your allegations of error and Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. as a Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve since the date of his commission and therefore was never eligible for a date of rank adjustment. e Active Status List erved continuously activ Reserve...