DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
HD: hd
Docket No: 05153-01
4 December 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested, in effect, that
the date of rank and effective date of your promotion to lieutenant be adjusted from
1 October, 2001 to 28 May 2001.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 29 November 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated
9 August 2001, a copy of which is attached. The Board also considered your undated
memorandum.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. They also noted that your selection by the first lieutenant promotion
board to consider you, by itself, does not require a conclusion that you would have been
selected earlier, had your consideration not been deferred.
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
furnished upon request.
In view of the above, your
will be
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
TN 38055-0000
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
MILLINGTON
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
5420
PERS-85
9 Aug 01
MEMORANDUM FOR BCNR
Via:
BUPERS/BCNR Coordinator
Subj: LT
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
Enclosure
1.
LT
1) is returned,
quest.
recommending disapproval of
Per SECNAVINST
142O.lA, upon entering active duty, a member
2.
must be notified of the one year deferral of being placed before
a promotion board and given the guidance as to how to waive the
deferral if so chosen.
This notification and guidance was
included i
orders (BUPERS Order 1939 dated 12 Jul
99).
As the
3.
that his request be denied.
id receive the notification, recommend
./ BCNR Liaison, Officer Promotions
and Enlisted Advancements Division
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07431-00
In addition, the Board considered the Navy Personnel Command the memorandum for the record dated 5 March 2001, and the NPC opinion dated 6 March 2001 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the PERS-85 advisory opinion dated 6 March 2001 in finding that your date of rank should not be adjusted because you would not have rated an adjustment when you came on active duty, had you requested one. r October 1996 of rank adjustment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08232-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. The member ’s statement and reporting senior ’s endorsement to his fitness report for the period 2 February 1995 to 3 1 January 1996 is filed in his record. As there is no evidence of administrative or material error in the member's record, per ref board is not warranted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04838-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 85 of 8 August 2001, a copy of which is,attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07117-00
Your allegations of error and Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. as a Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve since the date of his commission and therefore was never eligible for a date of rank adjustment. e Active Status List erved continuously activ Reserve...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01524-01
reques:ed removal of your failure of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session? opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 April attached. Enclosure (1) is returned, recommending disapproval of request to backdate his date of rank.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05081-00
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Active Duty Commander Line Promotion Selection Board acted that material error of fact or material contrary to law, administrative error occurred or that material information was not considered by the promotion selection board. Line Promotion Selection Board specifically directs the board to select officers that are...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02196-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 May 2000, and the memorandum for the record dated 14 February 2001, copies of which are attached. Former Reference (b) requires that promotion selection essage, as was promotion boards and The Per reference (c), a lieutenant who has at least...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00427-01
df an official naval record, the burden is on the Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y NAVY Ml,LLlNGTON TN PERSONNEL.~OMMAND 38OSSOOOO 5720 INTEGRITY brilVE 5420 PERS-85 18 Apr 01 . ?WDUM FOR BCNR Via: Subj: Ref: BUPERS/BCNR Coordinator USNR , (a) USC (b) USC 10 Sec. Lieutenanptoonce placed on the promoted to Lieutenant with'a date of rank of 16 Apr 01 in accorddnce with ref the member is entitled to the grade of TDRL.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03301-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S HD: hd Docket No: 03301-01 15 February 2002 Dear Command This is in reference to your application dated 20 April 2001 for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United States Code, section 1552, seeking removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 97 and 98 Lieutenant Commander Staff Selection Boards, and reinstatement to active duty as a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08250-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his date of rank in the grade of lieutenant as 19 August 1976 vice 20 May 1972. Counsel insisted that Petitioner’s lieutenant date of rank should be corrected as requested, to allow him to complete 30 years of service in fiscal year 2007. Accordingly, counsel requested, ’ in the event...