DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No: 1358-01
24 August 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 August 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 15 September 1943.
The record shows that you satisfactorily completed training as an
aviation machinist mate and were promoted to corporal on 16
December 1944.
changed to automobile mechanic, however, the reason for this
change is not reflected in the record.
You were honorably
discharged on 2 July 1946.
The report of separation shows
you were a corporal at that time.
On 1 October 1945, you military specialty was
that
With your application, you have submitted a copy of temporary
flight orders, dated 20 June 1945, which show that your rank was
sergeant.
You also contend that the report of separation should
show that you were an aviation mechanic instead of an automobile
mechanic.
As indicated, there is nothing in your record to show that you
were ever promoted to sergeant.
that the flight orders must be in error.
clearly shows that your military specialty was changed to
automobile mechanic.
your discharge from the Marine Corps,
Given the passage of over 55 years since
the only documentation
Accordingly, the Board concluded
Further, the record
available is your service record.
The Board concluded that you
were properly discharged in the grade of corporal and there is no
basis to change your military specialty.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the members
Accordingly, your
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04718-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. IN REPLY REFER TO: 1400/3 MMPR-2 13 Mar 01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF FORMER - ‘ a retired Marine indicates that he completed his he grade of probationary corporal and should have been promoted to the grade of sergeant prior to his retirement from the Marine Corps on 22...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07140-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00648-01
LTCOL E submitted a report of his investigation on 30 May 1986 and concluded that although MAJ S was disliked by many members of LTCOL E further found that HMM-364, he was a competent officer. On 17 December 1986, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) action was initiated against you for the following specifications of LTCOLs E and R, no disciplinary Documentation in the record indicates that on 1 He recommended charges be disrespect to a superior officer 3 disrespect, disobedience and dereliction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00991-02
As a result of this endorsement and Corporal request for a report date of 23 February 2001, CMC (RAM-2) published a set of orders on 17 January 2001 for Corporal Newsome ordering him to active duty (Enclosure (3)) effective 23 February 2001. Selected Marine Corps Reserve, accession to the AR program may disqualify you from this assignment. 36-month tour of active duty with the AR program to fill the following position: QUALITY ASSURANCE (6336) FORT WORTH TX 8820A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08002-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400/3 1~4MPR-2, 11 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a) XXXX requestback pay from 1 April 2003 through 6 September 2003 due to a promotion to sergeants.2. Based on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04427-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 11 and 2 1 May 2001, copies of which are attached. 118(11) page 11 entry dated MC0 (IRAM), contains general P1070.12H, Marine Corps Paragraph 4007.6 and 4007.7 of The commander is afforded full discretion in the 2. request for correcting his assigned conduct and duty p marks are provided: CONIs.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11287-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400/3 MMPR-2, 29 January 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03020-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08394-01
Petitioner c>aims his punishment was unjust 4. because he was never ordered not to buy a vehicle; even if he was given such an order, did not buy the car, rather he leased it; and finally, even if he was in the wrong, Petitioner believes his offense did not warrant reduction to LCpl and removal from MSG battalion. 3 Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS IN THE CASE 0 (BCNR) APPLICATION synopsis of the restrictions governing buying or renting vehicles while attached by Company...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08205-00
On 13 October 1999, Petitioner, then a Petitioner's appeal was denied. received NJP for intending to deceive 60 days Analysis. Petitioner, however, was just following the orders of his staff sergeant when he typed the false official document.