DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL R E C O R D S
2 N A V Y A N N E X
WASHINGTON D C 20370-5100
JLP: ddj
Docket No: 1458-03
8 April 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N13ODlIO3UO239 oof 26 March 2003, a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
D E P A R T M E N T OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF O F NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-2000
IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO
5420
N13 OD1 / 03210239
26 Mar 2003
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SE-
USN, W .
Encl: (1) BCNR case file #01458-03 with microfiche service record
1. The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman
petition.
2. N130 recommends disapproval of Seaman
an Enlistment Bonus (EB) College Kicker.
tition for
3. Seaman
May 2001 and volunte
his petition, Seaman
allow payment of a $2,000 EB College Kicker.
entered the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 31
the AEF/AECF Program Guarantee. In
equests favorable action that would
4. EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals
to enlist in critical skills. The EB program is budgeted based
on quotas provided by the Commander, Navy Recruiting Command and
the Enlisted Community Managers, not by the number of 'A" School
accession seats. An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed
under the preceding rules. Every recruit is not offered nor
receives an EB or an EB College Kicker. Seaman
have an EB College Kicker contract in his servi
therefore is not entitled to an EB College Kicker.
5. BCNR case file with microfiche se
herewith as enclosure (1) .
is returned
Head, Enlisted Bonus
Programs Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00320-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 0 3 ~ 0 2 4 5 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN APPRENTICE . In his petition, Seaman Apprentice a requests favorable action that would allow payment of a $2,000 EB College Kicker.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01420-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03110236 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS E CASE OF I Encl:...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00761-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In his petition, action that would allow paym CF Program quests favorable EB College Kicker.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00762-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. N130 recommends disapproval of for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) Colleg 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00705-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04859-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000IN REPLY REFER TO: 5420 N13OD1/...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00036-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer College Kicker EB contract in his service record and therefore is not entitled to a College Kicker EB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05739-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/ 29 Ott 2002 02UO582 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF, I T Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05739-02 with microfiche service record 1. Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is budgeted based Navy Recruiting Command and Seaman,mhas a valid EB Contract...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04972-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition; the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07284-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N which is attached. An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed Every recruit is not offered nor Navy Recruiting Command and the Seaman Apprentice Garcia has a valid EB Contract in the amount 5 .