DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
BIG
Docket No:
17 August 2001
6084-01
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested that your
reenlistment code of RE-4 (not eligible for reenlistment without prior approval of the Chief
of Naval Personnel) be upgraded to one that would allow you to be reenlisted in the Navy.
You contended that you were told you could reenlist after six months, since you were
separated so early.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 15 August 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board found your naval record shows that you entered
active duty on 17 February 1999; that you were discharged on 5 March 1999; and that you
had an entry level separation (ELS), meaning that you were discharged within 180 days of
your entry on active duty. They found you were properly assigned the RE-4 code in light of
your ELS.
In view of the above, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03974-01
yocr request to change the characterization of As you your You allege that the Department of Defense (DD) Form 214 ( Discharge from Active Duty ”) you were given to sign did not reflect the RE-4 code; and that the nurses and doctors at the Naval Hospital Great Lakes mental health clinic where you were treated did not have an explanation of why you were there. “Certificate of Release or A three-member panel of the Board ’ for Correction of session, considered your application on 3 1 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06622-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00472-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00598-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03398-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09329-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08283-01
You requested that your reenlistment code of RE-4 (not eligible for reenlistment without prior approval of the Chief of Naval Personnel) be changed. - physical disability) and a medical waiver, you could A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 December 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01316-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable and policies. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05886-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2001. Further, they questioned your credibility, in view of your assertion that you faked sleepwalking. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 007176-0
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 March 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...