DEPARTMENT OF THE N’AVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BJG
Docket No: 3398-01
16 May 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code,
section 1552. You requested that your reenlistment code of,RE-4 (not
eligible for reenlistment without prior approval of the Chief of Naval
Personnel) be upgraded. You alleged that the psychiatrist who analyzed you
for separation stated that this code would not affect your ability to
reenlist.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting
in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2001. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the
existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the
Board found that your naval record shows that you entered active duty on
27 October 1998; that you were discharged on 18 December 1998 by reason of
erroneous entry (other); that you were processed for separation because
you had been diagnosed with enuresis; that you had an entry level
separation (ELS), meaning that you were discharged within 180 days after
your entry on active duty; and that you received the RE-4 code appropriate
for an ELS. Your assertion as to what you were told about the effect of
your reenlistment code did not persuade them that the code should be
changed. In view of the above, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or
other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all
official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06622-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06084-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00598-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00472-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08283-01
You requested that your reenlistment code of RE-4 (not eligible for reenlistment without prior approval of the Chief of Naval Personnel) be changed. - physical disability) and a medical waiver, you could A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 December 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03974-01
yocr request to change the characterization of As you your You allege that the Department of Defense (DD) Form 214 ( Discharge from Active Duty ”) you were given to sign did not reflect the RE-4 code; and that the nurses and doctors at the Naval Hospital Great Lakes mental health clinic where you were treated did not have an explanation of why you were there. “Certificate of Release or A three-member panel of the Board ’ for Correction of session, considered your application on 3 1 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00954-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with adm'inistrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Your allegations of error and mzterial submitted in support After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07008-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. on the urinalysis you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05886-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2001. Further, they questioned your credibility, in view of your assertion that you faked sleepwalking. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00400-01
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE—4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated based on a diagnosed personality disorder, and such a...