DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
BIG
Docket No: 472-01
9 February 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You request that your
reenlistment code of RE-4 (not eligible for reenlistment without prior approval of the Chief
of Naval Personnel) be changed. You allege that you did not overdose or attempt suicide,
but made up these things to go home and see your newborn baby. You say you want help
getting back into the military as you need a job, and you want to make yourself and those
counting on you proud.
.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 February 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board found your naval record shows that you entered
active duty in the Navy on 28 August 2000; that you were discharged on 31 October 2000 by
reason of “erroneous entry (other)“; that you were diagnosed with major depressive disorder,
single episode, severe, with suicidal gesture, overdose, and personality disorder, not
otherwise specified, with borderline features; that you had an entry level separation
meaning that you were discharged within 180 days of your entry on active duty; and that you
received the RE-4 code appropriate for an ELS. The Board was unable to find the diagnoses
for which you were discharged were based on false information. In view of the above, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
(ELS),
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01863-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were so discharged on 15 May 2000 and assigned and waived the right to Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. Since you have been treated no differently than others discharged under similar...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07438-05
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change of your narrative reason for separation or reenlistment code...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06622-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00598-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06039-00
6039-00 9 February 2001 -_ Dear- This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United Board for Correction of Navy A three-member panel for the Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that the Navy's diagnosis of a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03886-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority Thereafter, You did not You were The fact that you did not receive The Board noted your contention to the effect that you During classification interviews in recruit it is determined whether an individual is qualified for "A" school, even though you had and as a result...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07507-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03279-01
Concerning your abuse of alcohol you stated that It was also noted that you had previously been diagnosed The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 May 2000 at age 22. Based on the foregoing record, administrative separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment, a and alcohol abuse rehabilitation designated mental condition, Subsequently, the separation authority directed an failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07640-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2010. The Board found that you entered active duty in the Navy on 23 August 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04916-01
A psychiatric evaluation in the record states that you were referred by the chaplain for depression, frequent crying, inability to adapt to military life, anger, anxiety, and problems with your family and girlfriend. facts alleged at the time including the alcohol abuse, breaking mirrors, and general unhappiness were fictional and designed to create a picture of distress. He appears have an understanding of the reality Clinical evidence However, pre- The Board noted that the diagnosed...