Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04810-00
Original file (04810-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 203704100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 4810-00
24 October 2000

Dear PETTY OFFICER

,

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 24 October 2000.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1070 PERS 3  
of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice

12E/33 of 15 September 2000, a copy

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application   has been denied.   The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE

  NAV Y

NAVY  PERSONNEL  COMMAN D

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000

1070
PERS-312E/33

From:
To:
Via:

Subj:

Commander,
Executive Director,
Assistant,
(Pers-OOZ)

ION

Navy Personnel Command

Board for Correction of Naval

Records

Board for Correction of Naval Records

Ref:

(a) Docket Number 4810-00

Reference (a) is disapproved. In our opinion, member's

1.
service record does not support the fact that Mansfield, TX was
the home of record at the time he reported for active duty on
27 December 1993.
home of record.

His record shows Crystal City, Missouri as the



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05504-00

    Original file (05504-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 5504-00 24 October 2000 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02136-01

    Original file (02136-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. -In our opinion, member's home...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04963-00

    Original file (04963-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05289-99

    Original file (05289-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON M: 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 5289-99 27 January 2000 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 January 2000. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08159-00

    Original file (08159-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00405-00

    Original file (00405-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. briefing official where the alleged miscounseling occurred stating he provided incorrect information during his brief, a more favorable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05771-00

    Original file (05771-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. orders in June 2000 and was in a student status on 01 August 2000. d. The petitioner was advised that he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05783-01

    Original file (05783-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370.5100 LCC: ddj Docket No: 16 October 2001 5783-01 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04484-00

    Original file (04484-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board 18 August 2000, copies of which are attached. Evaluation Review Board Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps NAVY HEADGUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS DEPARTMENT OF THE 3280 RUSSELL ROA D OUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 107 0 MI MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05254-01

    Original file (05254-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum I60 Pers 8 1 I attached. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 3.