DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2
NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5100
dd~j
LCC:
Docket
17 October 2000
No: 38 19-00
Dear COMMANDER
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 October 2000. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NAVSUPSYSCMD memorandum 4050 SER
2000, a copy of which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
53C/191 of 19 September
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
TELEPHONE
NUMBER
COMMERC
IAL
AUTOVON
IN R E P L Y REFER
TO
4050
Ser
SEP
53C/191
19
2000
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
Commander,
Board for Correction of Naval Records
Naval Supply Systems Command
(a) BCNR memo PAY: ga of 22 Jun 00
(1)
(2)
Subject's Microfiche File
BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
Enclosures (1) and (2) are returned.
we have reviewed enclosure (1).
Property Office at Naval Station Roosevelt
Our review concluded that despite whatever he was or was not
2.
told by the Personal
Roads,
allowa
showed he also exceeded his weight allowance when he moved to
Puerto Rico in 1996 but was never billed for those costs.
is no legal basis to waive his current
and he should promptly repay the $945.19 debt.
There
17,500-pound weight limit,
shipped more than his prescribed weight
for the resulting excess costs.
Research
3.
We do not recommend favorable Board action.
.
copy to:
NAVTRANS
(Ms.-
VlSit the
NAVSUP Home Page at
WWW.naVSUp.naVy.mil
For One
Touch Supply go to
www.navsup.navy.mil/onetouch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01309-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. He was advised that based on his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01232-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUPSYSCMD letter, 4050 Ser 53E/024, 27 March 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10050-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2003 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In response to reference (a), we have reviewed enclosure (1).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05550-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to travel of dependents and shipment of household goods (HHG) when he was sent on 560 days Temporary Additional Duty.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Lucas, Mann, and Storz, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 August 2007 and, pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13193-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06384-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08249-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09440-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00006-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafterreferred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be correctedto show the orders that reassigned Petitioner were issued prior to 18 October 2007.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00011-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the orders reassigning Petitioner to VAQ 129, Whidbey Island, WA were issued prior to 10 August 2007 and entitled to an incentive payment for moving his household goods (HHG) under the Do-It-Yourself (DITY) Program.2. The Board, Consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed...