Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05858-02
Original file (05858-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 5858-02
3 December 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 3 December 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1040 MRV undated, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

/‘kPARTivlENT OF THE 

NAd

BUREAU 

0F 

NAVAL 

PERSONNEL

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, PERS-OOZCB

7220
PERS-822
1 NOV 02

Ref:

(a) NPC  memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 8  
(b) 10  

U.S.C.  

971

Encl:

(1) BCNR file

ORMER LT

Ott  02

Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in

1.
subject's case.
his Pay Entry Base Date  
to reflect all prior service.

Specifically,

Petitioner requests correction of

(PEBD)  and Active Duty Start Date  

(ADSD)

Per reference  

2.
midshipmen time for any reason.
action.

(b),

SNO  is not entitled to credit for

Enclosure 

(1) returned without

Asst Branch Head,
Officer Retirements



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01576-02

    Original file (01576-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06339-02

    Original file (06339-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Pers 812 of 10 September 2002, a copy of which is attached. further action required.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00959-02

    Original file (00959-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the member should provide...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05602-02

    Original file (05602-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosures (1) and (2) are previous re As indicated in the responses, request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03638-02

    Original file (03638-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    following comments and recommendation concerning request that her date of transfer to Standby Reserve-Inactive (USNR-S2) status be changed from 31 August 2000 to 1997 and all failures of selection that date be removed. After her release from active duty, she entered the Individual Ready Reserve the Naval Reserve. Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, regardless of their active participation.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01184-02

    Original file (01184-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7220 Pers 823 of 22 April 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01504-02

    Original file (01504-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. case it was due to General...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05492-02

    Original file (05492-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 23 August 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04593-02

    Original file (04593-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07839-02

    Original file (07839-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...