Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01307-01
Original file (01307-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 1307-01
30 May 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material 
comidered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 7220 
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

PERS 822 of 26 April 2001, a copy of which

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
has been denied. The names and votes of
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application 
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF 
PLRlOWWEL  
INTLQRITY  

NAVY 
S710 
YlLLllOTOr  

TN 

THE NAVY
COYIYAWD
Dl!lVL

3805l;-0000

7220
PERS-822
26 Apr 01

MEMORANDUM FOR

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, PERS-OOZCB

N 

ICOd

Ref: (a)

NPC memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 27 Mar 01

(b) 10 USC 2107

Encl:

(1) Statement of Service of 13 Apr 01
(2) BCNR file

Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject
Specifically, Petitioner requests credit for his

1.
officer's case.
time as a student at Miami University.

He signed an oath of

The OPNAV Notice that is mentioned in member's request

2.
pertains to the BOOST program.
program.
him as a midshipman.
the ROTC program.
for any purpose.
towards his retainer pay for his midshipman cruises.

mwas not in the BOOST
6 August 1987 designating
He attended Miami University as a student i
me is not creditable
will receive credit

Per reference
Upon retirement

n

3.

Enclosure (2) is returned.

Assistant Branch Head,
Officer Retirements



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07491-00

    Original file (07491-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. to document Petitioner's pay entry base date of 9 May Members in NCP do not perform any drills and initial period of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05391-01

    Original file (05391-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    is returned with the recommendation that CAPT sure request, to add 126 days of additional active duty to his Statement of Service for Naval Reserve retirement, be denied. Therefore, this service, when performed, should have been documented in the member's permanent personnel record. s permanent personnel record contains no such orders, nor As an NROTC midshipmen Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08239-00

    Original file (08239-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1) shows member served 3 years, 11 months and 29 days of active enlisted service and therefore is not entitled to E pay.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06730-01

    Original file (06730-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1) shows member served four years of active enlisted service from 1 June 1993 to 31 May 1997, Reserves until he joined the Air Force Reserves on 17 August 1998. a nator: Date of Report: 10/24/01 33 Statement of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00028-03

    Original file (00028-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject officer's case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08029-00

    Original file (08029-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. 2. certain criteria are entitled to constructive credit. 6 months and 9 days of active duty and was not entitled to Enclosure (1) shows member only completed 19 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04714-04

    Original file (04714-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statute s, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant t demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a request comments and recommendations in subject’s case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02248-02

    Original file (02248-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Therefore, we can not recommend just adding 126 days active duty to his Statement of Service for his Naval Reserve Retirement Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN CASE OF unless we have documentation in order to support...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06261-00

    Original file (06261-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE: NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 2037C-5100 HD: hd Docket No: 06261-00 4 June 2001 C USNR Dear Lieuten This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, your lieutenant date of rank be changed from 20 May 1 March 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08073-01

    Original file (08073-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. request comments and recommendations in Specifically, petitioner requests increase Per reference (b), only those personnel who are transferred 2. to the Fleet Reserve are accorded the increase of retainer pay for Extraordinary Heroism. Assistant Officer Retirements Branch Head, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE...