Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04961-01
Original file (04961-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

TJR
Docket No: 4961-01
8 November 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 November 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

The Board found you reenlisted in the Navy on.25 June 1993 after
four years of prior honorable service.
you continued to serve without disciplinary incident.
it appears that you submitted a written statement in which you
admitted to participating in homosexual activities.

Your record reflects that

However,

Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative discharge
by reason of homosexual admission.
discharge authority directed an honorable discharge by reason of
homosexual admission, and on 19 November 1993 you were so
discharged and assigned an  

RR-4 reenlistment code.

On 9 November 1993 the

The Board, in its review of your naval record, although
incomplete, and application, carefully weighed all potentially
The
mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable service.
Board also considered your contention that because you disclosed
you were poorly judged and
facts about your sexual preference,
assigned an RR-4 reenlistment code.
these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant a

However, the Board concluded

change in your reenlistment code.
mandatory when an individual is separated by reason of homosexual
admission.
concluded your reenlistment code was proper and no change is
warranted.

Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board

Further, such a code is

Accordingly, your application has been denied.

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02846-02

    Original file (02846-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. admission that you participated in homosexual conduct was sufficient to support the entry level separation and the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. code...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03914-01

    Original file (03914-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    .the Board for Correction of Naval A three-member panel of Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The record clearly shows that you were discharged on 15 March 2001 with an honorable discharge by reason of your admission to homosexual activities. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03852-10

    Original file (03852-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 16 April 2001, you submitted a written statement to your commanding officer, acknowledging that you were being administratively discharged by reason of homosexuality as evidenced by your own admission. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08420-00

    Original file (08420-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance and must be assigned to individuals who are discharged for homosexuality. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07895-07

    Original file (07895-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2008. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire the Board found that the evidence submitted was record, probable material insufficient to establish the existence of error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06660-10

    Original file (06660-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your characterization for discharge, given your homosexual...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07563-01

    Original file (07563-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2001. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not At that time you were assigned a reenlistment code of You committed a homosexual act with another Sailor onboard a ship. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code must be assigned to individuals who are discharged for homosexuality.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04854-01

    Original file (04854-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 18 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08680-00

    Original file (08680-00.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04281-98

    Original file (04281-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    were so separated and assigned an RR-4 reenlistment code. However, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code since an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is separated due to entry level performance and conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.