Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TJR
Docket No: 4281-98
16 April 1999
This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code, Section 1552.
application for correction of your
provisions of Title 10, United
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
apijlication on 13 April 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
and applicable statutes, regulations,
thereof, your naval record,
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
undergoing a psychiatric examination,
The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 8 March 1993 at the
age of 22.
adjustment disorder with a depressed mood and
personality traits.
Your record reflects that on 18 March 1993, after
you were diagnosed with an
avoidant
At this time you waived your rights to consult with
Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative
separation action by reason of entry level performance and
conduct.
legal counsel and to submit a statement in rebuttal to the
separation.
you be issued an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason
of entry level performance and conduct.
were so separated and assigned an RR-4 reenlistment code.
On 23 March 1993 the discharge authority directed
On 26 March 1993 you
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all, potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity, post service conduct, and your
contention that you would like your reenlistment code changed so
YOU may reenlist now that you no longer have an
that
The Board further considered
aversion to large groups of people.
your contention that you accepted the entry level separation with
the understanding that you could reenlist at a later date.
However, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to
warrant a change in your reenlistment code since an RE-4
reenlistment code is required when an individual is separated due
to entry level performance and conduct.
circumstances of your case,
code was proper and no change is warranted.
application has been denied.
the Board concluded your reenlistment
unknown
Given all the
Accordingly, your
The names
upon request.
and*,votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00526-99
Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 21 May 1999 526-99 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00198-99
Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You were ordered to The The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 26 August 1991 for eight years at age 20. active duty for a period of two years on 4 December 1991. record reflects that you were advanced to SN (E-3) and served without incident until...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07734-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given your refusal to reenlist.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00524-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05818-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 5818-02 15 August 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. sitting in executive session, considered your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, application on 13 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08561-98
_( A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Board concluded that the assigned reenlistment code in this case Accordingly, was harmless error and does not warrant removal. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 05769-00
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 26 April 1994 you were notified of proposed administrative separation action by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure due to your refusal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08244-98
On 5 September 1989 you were diagnosed with a severe borderline personality disorder which existed prior to enlistment (EPTE) and alcohol abuse. Further, the Board noted that even though you had been warned of Given an administrative separation, the Board concluded that your all the circumstances of your case, discharge, narrative reason for separation, and reenlistment code were proper and no change is warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09439-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2003. On 26 November 1999 you were notified of administrative separation action by reason of convenience of the government due to defective enlistment and induction and/or erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the diagnosed oppositional defiant disorder and alcohol dependency. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04418-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2010. On 19 July 1999, you were discharged from active duty with an entry level separation and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code based on your performance and conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.