Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02846-02
Original file (02846-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY

BOARD 

F&R CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

TJR
Docket No: 2846-02
27 November 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 26 November 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 22 June 1998 at the age of 20.
November 1998 you submitted a written statement in which you
admitted to participating in homosexual acts and said that you
would continue to participate in homosexual activities.
statement you also requested separation.

In your

On 2

On 9 November 1998 you were notified of pending administrative
separation action due to your admission of homosexual conduct.
At that time you waived your right to consult with legal counsel
and to present your case to an administrative discharge board.
Subsequently, your commanding officer recommended an entry level
separation due to admission of participation in homosexual
conduct and intent to continue engaging in homosexual acts.
recommendation was approved and the discharge authority directed
an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of homosexual
On 8 April 1999 you were so separated and assigned an
admission.
RR-4 reenlistment code.

This

Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors and

The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity and your contentions that the discharge was forced on
you.
contentions were not sufficient to warrant a change in your
separation or reenlistment code.
admission that you participated in homosexual conduct was
sufficient to support the entry level separation and the
assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code.
code must be assigned to individuals who are separated due to
admission of participation in homosexual acts. Accordingly, your
application has been denied.

The Board concluded that your

In this regard, such a

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04854-01

    Original file (04854-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 18 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08680-00

    Original file (08680-00.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08420-00

    Original file (08420-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance and must be assigned to individuals who are discharged for homosexuality. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06660-10

    Original file (06660-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your characterization for discharge, given your homosexual...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05383-98

    Original file (05383-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thereafter, the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness due to homosexuality. On 29 May 1980, the Naval Discharge Review Board upgraded your undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. VnfitnessV1 as the reason At the time, this reason for separation was In its review of your application, the Board conducted a careful search of your service record for any mitigating factors which might warrant changing the reason for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01339-02

    Original file (01339-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative procedures.applicable to the proceedings of this regulations and Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Board found these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your admission to participating in homosexual...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10614-10

    Original file (10614-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, since the activity occurred onboard a naval vessel, it is sufficient even under current standards to warrant an OTH discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04961-01

    Original file (04961-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant a However, the Board concluded change in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05068-01

    Original file (05068-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TJR Docket No: 5068-01 15 January 2002 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. authorized and normally assigned when individuals are separated The Board noted your contention that you lied for that reason.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04090-01

    Original file (04090-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. reenlistment...