Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08680-00
Original file (08680-00.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

                                2 NAVY ANNEX

                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

                                                     TRG
                                                     Docket No: 8680-00
                                                     31 May 2001







  This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
  record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code
  section 1552.

  A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting
  in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Your
  allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
  administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
  this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
  application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
  naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

  After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
  Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the
  existence of probable material error or injustice.

  The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 1 August 1996 at age 18.
  The record shows that you served in an excellent manner for about 22
  months. On 30 May 1998 you wrote a letter to your commanding officer
  claiming that you were homosexual. Subsequently, the investigating officer
  recommended a general discharge because of your failure to complete your
  service obligation and your failure to inform the command that you were
  taking prozac for depression while you were in a flight status.

  Based on your admission you were processed for an administrative discharge
  by reason of homosexuality. In connection with this processing, you
  elected to waive your procedural rights. On 27 July 1998 the discharge
  authority approved the recommendation of your commanding officer that you
  be discharged, with the type of discharge warranted by your service
  record, by reason of your admission of homosexual conduct. You were
  honorably discharged on 5 August 1998. At that time, you were not
  recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE—4 reenlistment code.

  You state in your application that you regret stating that you were
  homosexual, you are not homosexual, and you do not have a propensity to
  engage in such activity. You desire a change in
the reenlistment code so you can reenlist in the Navy.

Regulations require the assignment of an RE—4 reenlistment code when an
individual is discharged due to homosexual acts or an admission of
homosexuality. Additionally, the Board was unable to determine which of
your statements is true, the one you are making now or the one you made to
procure your discharge. The Board is aware that it is well settled in the
law that an individual who perpetrates a fraud in order to be discharged
should not benefit from that fraud when it is discovered. Since you have
been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board
concluded that there is no error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4
reenlistment code.

Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable
action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its
decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep
in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,
the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable
material error or injustice.

                                 Sincerely,



                                  W.    DEAN PFEIFFER
                                  Executive Director



















                                      2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07563-01

    Original file (07563-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2001. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not At that time you were assigned a reenlistment code of You committed a homosexual act with another Sailor onboard a ship. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code must be assigned to individuals who are discharged for homosexuality.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01061-02

    Original file (01061-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. honorable discharge by reason of homosexual conduct received an At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment admission. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02846-02

    Original file (02846-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. admission that you participated in homosexual conduct was sufficient to support the entry level separation and the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. code...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04854-01

    Original file (04854-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 18 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08420-00

    Original file (08420-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance and must be assigned to individuals who are discharged for homosexuality. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04210-09

    Original file (04210-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 2009. The Board could not determine if you lied in 1992 in order to procure your discharge, as you imply in your application, or if you lied in your application in the hope of receiving a more favorable reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08527-02

    Original file (08527-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Based on your statement, on 18 August 1994 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of your homosexuality.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03914-01

    Original file (03914-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    .the Board for Correction of Naval A three-member panel of Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The record clearly shows that you were discharged on 15 March 2001 with an honorable discharge by reason of your admission to homosexual activities. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02849-05

    Original file (02849-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11214-07

    Original file (11214-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRSDocket No: 11214-07 20 March 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code’ section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your...