DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
CRS
Docket No:
19 October
4730-01
2001
Dear-
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 October 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 8
February 1951 at age 17.
two nonjudicial punishments and were convicted by a summary
The offenses included unauthorized absences
court-martial.
totalling three days, failure to obey a lawful order, and
disrespect.
reason of expiration of term of service.
Thereafter, you received a general discharge by
The record reflects that you received
Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and
proficiency averages,
both of which are computed from marks
assigned during periodic evaluations.
proficiency averages were 3.9 and 5.1, respectively.
average conduct mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable
characterization of service at the time of separation.
Your conduct and
A minimum
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
and good postservice conduct.
these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization
However, the Board concluded that
such as your youth and immaturity
Accordingly, your
The names and votes of the members
of your discharge given the three disciplinary actions as well as
the fact that your conduct average was insufficiently high to
warrant a fully honorable discharge.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01717-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Thereafter, you were separated under honorable conditions totalling 27 days, failure to obey a lawful The record reflects that you received The offenses included Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01445-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2001. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary action, and since your conduct and proficiency averages were insufficiently high to warrant a fully honorable In this regard, there is no evidence of any medical discharge. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02014-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. average marks of 4.0...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02265-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2001. injustice were reviewed inaccordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. A minimum average conduct mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02807-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09586-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A minimum average mark of 4.0 in conduct was required at the time of your separation for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03849-01
3849-01 12 October 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 11 October 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. incident...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03209-01
you were told that after six months, your discharge would be The Board concluded that the foregoing factors and upgraded. contention were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of three of service, and the fact that you failed to achieve the required average in conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05722-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct and your failure to achieve the required average mark in conduct. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03093-01
3093-01 15 October 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 11 October 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The fact...